So calming

So it wears thin, after 24 years it just wears thin, you’re going to help me.  Yeah, sure you are, sick-boys. You just want  to make me suffer, wear me down mentally and physically, destroy me to keep freaks happy, psychopathic freaks who demand my destruction, loony-tunes who prostrate themselves before the empty sky and think it their duty to make everyone else do that too, sexually disgusting freaks, dirty little animals who think they own other people, can inflict their nutjob freak filth on others  Load of nutjob loonies trumpeting they got Troof, they got a revelation from Almighty God.
 
Think it’s all a joke don’t you, huge laugh, all the rich criminal vermin like Johnson and Cameron, except what they think is probably worse: some Jew bitch wanting money, haw-haw, of course Jews always want money, and of coure vermin like Corbyn and McDonnell don’t worry at butchering and destroying some Jew woman.  For the millionth time, you filth Nazi vermin I am not Jewish.  If I were Jewish, I’d say I was Jewish.  I am not Jewish.  Probably too there is a distant, “Well, of course the Jews will look after her.”  No, they won’t, you ludicrous piles of maggot-ridden infected shit, because I am not a Jew.  No, of course no one has conspired to butcher and destroy an Englishwoman, only a Jew bitch.   I suspect I am unrecognizable to myself in the circles in which my fate is decided, thanks to the evil of those who reject transparency.
 
Carrion, not of course that it worries anyone that I think them carrion because the people it ought to worry are carrion too.
 
Just a joke to you all, making a woman suffer.  The refusal to change that room round, the refusal to impose democracy on the filth, a Prime Minister who closeted himself with the agents of hostile facists foreign powers inimical to English liberty while he was having me crippled. 
 
You’d bloody help me fast enough if you wanted to.  There’s me forgetting you’re going to pay me one day, after I’m dead; of course you have no intention whatever of paying me ever.  I have to be punished.  I have to suffer.
 
Somehow  get a picture of my bent and broken body in the open real-time to show what the evil traitor ape Blair and his filthy groveller whore have done to me for being intelligent, educated, literate, rational, honest, democratic, free, female, all the things their pervert psychopath Church abhors, the sweaty smelly animals who sit clutching their dirty wizened pricks at the power to break a woman’s body.  All the things I have never done or can never do again because these obscene freak pervert drooling subhuman monsters took my health from me, took from me control of my body.
 
What does a woman need the use of her legs for?  A woman’s place on her back.  Just not seemly to the demented obscene perverts, that a woman go hiking, get all hot and sweaty be able to read and map and use a compass.
 
Of course any display of female autonomy, whether sexual, physical, emotional or intellectual, is abhorred by the sick old freaks.
 
And what does a sick-boy slum-boy thug butcher animal traitor like Milburn whine, “Oh pet, don’t take on so’, as though I were a little girl with a grazed knee.  I have been crippled you filthy ape, you sick, foul. evil filthy bag of pus, you dirty filthy animal, a Cabinet Minister who refused to impose democracy, a piece of muck who loves and vaunts other muck, a piece of gallow-food, crippled by your cold bestial brutal ruthless evil.  Just boys having a bit of fun, boys having a bit of a larf, wasn’t it, slum-ape, gutter-vermin.  Don’t want to interfere with boys having their fun, do you, filth-monkey. 
 
The problem with doing an Andy Murray, currently winning at Wimbledon with a metal hip, is of course 32 years between us.  Still I do think I can get fitter than I am now, though I shan’t be able to change my posture, be a bent old crone toddling around with a rollator who walks further than I do at present.  I do need to get things done inside first, by which I mean inside the flat not inside me, just slowly and steadily - I mean one day to clock up on a pedometer app how far I walk in a day just extremely slowly but steadily sorting stuff out and moving it around.  This is because walking outside would knock me out initially at least, so much so that nothing except absolute basics would get done inside. 
 
And of course a great deal of TLC.  Andy won in a stellar performance, causing some tennis commentators to go mad - the Championship next!  I really couldn't bear to be a wet blanket but nothing about today's performance confirms he'll be able to repeat it every two days for the next fortnight. 
 
What should have happened if these creatures were not vermin, is that as soon as I became unable to walk properly, game over, people clustering round me, how can we get you 100%, get you out of there away from them, just one person to be kind to me and understand what is at stake.  But of course no-one has ever been kind to me, no-one has ever admitted has happened.    But of course the evil perverts riddled with malice, riddled with venom wouldn’t hear of it, I have to punished, I have to suffer, probably whore slag vermin like Khwaja echoed Sacranie, and I had to be made to beg forgiveness from Almighty Allah, the sexually diseased pervert in the sky that doesn’t exist.   After all the pervert freak nut-jobs whores all know I’m a whore for having had a sex life, and who cares what happens to whores?  Left in the hands of primitive man, sexually diseased savages who think a sexually active woman is a whore.  Look at the filthy nut-job savages, Khwaja, Nathwani, Goldstone, Linch.  Probably got mummies dolled like Darth Vader screaming the place down about the ‘whore’.  Hey, Goldstone, mummy wear a wig, did she, Daddy thank G-d every morning for not making him a woman.  Freaks who think I’m a freak for being normal.  Think I should be stoned, do you.  Normal in your filthy freak-holes that a woman who has sex outside marriage is punished, normal that women are ashamed of their bodies, ashamed to be women, taught women are evil, temptresses, taught to be fractured, totally dissociated from their bodies, the mental rape that breaks them open into that which will obey, is meaningless to politicians and clergy alike, to whom the rapists are good and holy men, or of course good and holy women, their filthy kinky-bitch mothers, boys equally Severed, cut off from source, from humanity, taught the evil of being a normal human being.  Just beat them. 
 
Well, it usually works,  works in your monkey-pits.  They don’t realize they are the victims of child abuse, of course.  They think they’re normal and everyone else is a freak.
 
Oh I must be so ashamed
 
No, I mustn’t, freak sicko. What is there to be ashamed of? My body, sick pervert. I chose to whom to give it and to whom not. I, a sentient adult human being. But it’s not my body, it’s God’s property. The fuck a freak like you knows if God exists never minds minds me making love. Some ancient Jew about 3000 years ago thought God objects. All bound up with Eve of course. Personally I like apples. My teeth don’t do them raw any more but I bake them with sultanas. Bound up with the sub-species woman being a lusting animal. The bulk of Jews being normal western people having moved on disguises where Islam got its shit from
 
PANTHER -> Anglican England, past, present and future -> The status of women in the Old Testament by Ysabel Howard - Saturday, 21 March 2009, 10:28 AM Passages treating women as inferior to men How the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) generally viewed women: Women's behavior was extremely limited in ancient times, much as the women of Afghanistan during the recent Taliban oppression. They were: Unmarried women were not allowed to leave the home of their father. Married women were not allowed to leave the home of their husband. They were normally restricted to roles of little or no authority. They could not testify in court. They could not appear in public venues. They were not allowed to talk to strangers. They had to be doubly veiled when they left their homes. 1 In the Hebrew Scriptures, women were generally viewed in a negative light: Women were considered inferior to men: Genesis 1:27 to 3:24: In the first creation story (Genesis 1:27) God is described as creating man, both male and female at the same time: "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them." 2 This might be interpreted as implying equality between the two genders. But in the second creation story, (Genesis 2:7) God formed only a man: "...the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. Realizing that he needed a helper (Genesis 2:18), God marched all of the animals past Adam (Genesis 2:19-20) looking for a suitable animal. Finding none suitable, God created Eve out of one of Adam's ribs. The term "helper" has historically been interpreted as implying an inferior role for Eve, although some modern interpreters believe that the word can mean a companion of equal status. "...the Hebrew word translated "helper" is used twenty-one times in the Old Testament: twenty of these cases refer to help from a superior." (3) In Genesis 2:27, Adam later asserts his authority over Eve by naming her: "...she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man." In ancient times, one was believed to have authority over a person or thing by naming it. Genesis 3:16: Adam's role is to be Eve's master. The King James Version (KJV), New International Version (NIV), and Revised Standard Version (RSV) use the term "rule" to describe Adam's role over Eve: "...thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee." The Living Bible uses the term "master". The Modern Language Bible uses "dominate". By implication, all of their descendents are would have the same power imbalance between spouses. A man could marry (literally "become the master of the woman") as often as he desired. In Genesis 4:19, Lamech became the first known polygamist when he took two wives. Subsequent men who took multiple wives included: Esau with 3 wives; Jacob: 2; Ashur: 2; Gideon: many; Elkanah: 2; David: many; Solomon: 700 wives of royal birth; Rehaboam: 3; Abijah: 14. Jehoram, Joash, Ahab, Jeholachin and Belshazzar also had multiple wives. Genesis 16:2 : Sarah gave permission to her husband Abraham to engage in sexual intercourse with her maid, Hagar: "Sarai said unto Abram...I pray thee, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her." Presumably this was done without the consent of Hagar, who had such a low status in the society of the day that she was required to submit to multiple rapes at her owner's command. Genesis 19:8: The men of Sodom gathered around Lot's house, and asked that he bring his two guests out so that the men can "know" them. This is frequently interpreted as a desire to gang rape the visitors, although other interpretations are possible. Lot offers his two virgin daughters to be raped instead: He is recorded as saying: "I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes." Yet, even after this despicable act, Lot is still regarded as an honorable man, worth saving from the destruction of the city. Allowing one's daughters to be sexually assaulted by multiple rapists appears to be treated as a minor transgression, because of the low status of the young women. More details on Genesis 19. Genesis 21:10: A man could simultaneously keep numerous concubines. These were sexual partners of an even lower status than a wife was. As implied in this verse she could be dismissed when no longer needed: Sarah is recorded as saying: "...Cast out this bondwoman and her son: for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, even with Isaac." Abraham had two concubines; Gideon: at least 1; David: many; Nahor: 1; Jacob: 1; Eliphaz: 1; Gideon: 1; Caleb: 2; Manassah: 1; Saul: 1; David: at least 10; Rehoboam: 60; Solomon: 300; an unidentified Levite: 1; Belshazzar: more than 1. In Exodus 1:15-16, the Pharaoh ordered the midwives to kill all Jewish boys at birth, because of the threat that they might pose to the kingdom. "And he said, When ye do the office of a midwife to the Hebrew women, and see them upon the stools; if it be a son, then ye shall kill him: but if it be a daughter, then she shall live." The girls, being considered less important, were not seen as a threat; they were allowed to live. Exodus 20 & 21: This is perhaps the most misogynistic pair of chapters in the Bible. A number of verses describe a woman as the property of her father. At marriage, her ownership was transferred to her new husband: Exodus 20:17 lists the last of the Ten Commandments: "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's." It is important to realize that a manservent and a maidservant were male and female slaves. They were not a hired butler and maid. The tenth commandment forbids coveting your neighbor's house, wife, male slave female slave, animals or anything else that the neighbor owns. The wife is clearly regarded as equivalent to a piece of property. Exodus 21:2-4: "If thou buy an Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing....If his master have given him a wife, and she have born him sons or daughters; the wife and her children shall be her master's, and he shall go out by himself." A slaveowner was permitted to give a woman to his male slave as a wife. There is no indication that women were consulted during this type of transaction. After serving six years, he would leave, but his wife and children would remain slaves of the slaveowner. Again, there is no indication that the woman was consulted on this arrangement, Exodus 21:7: "And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the menservants do." A father could sell his daughter as a slave. Even though a male slave is automatically given his freedom after 6 years, a female slave remained a slave forever. Exodus 22:16-17: The first seventeen verses of Exodus 22 deal with restitution in case of stealing, or damage to, a person's property. Verses 16 and 17 deal with the case of a man who seduces a virgin. This was viewed as a property offense against the woman's father. The woman was expected to marry the seducer. If her father refused to transfer ownership of his daughter to the seducer, the latter was required to required to pay money to her father. The money would be in compensation for the damage to the father's property - his daughter. It would be difficult for a non-virgin to marry. Exodus 21:22-25 describes a situation in which two men are fighting and one hits a pregnant woman. If the woman has a miscarriage because of the blow, the man is punished as the husband decides and must pay a fine for their act - not to the woman, but to her husband, presumably because he has been deprived of a child. The woman had no involvement. Exodus 21:22: "...he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine." Exodus 23:17 states that only men are required to take part in the feasts of unleavened bread, of harvest and of ingathering: "Three times in the year all thy males shall appear before the Lord GOD." Sponsored link: During the Second Temple period, women were not allowed to testify in court trials. They could not go out in public, or talk to strangers. When outside of their homes, they were to be doubly veiled. "They had become second-class Jews, excluded from the worship and teaching of God, with status scarcely above that of slaves." 3 Leviticus: This book deals mainly with the duties of the priesthood, the Levites. Women were not allowed to become priests. Leviticus 12:1-5 Quotes God as stating that a woman who has given birth to a boy is ritually unclean for 7 days. If the baby is a girl, the mother is unclean for 14 days. "If a woman have conceived seed, and born a man child: then she shall be unclean seven days...But if she bear a maid child, then she shall be unclean two weeks..." It would appear that the act of having a baby is a highly polluting act. To give birth to a girl is twice as polluting as is giving birth to a boy. In Leviticus 18:20 adultery was defined as a man having sexual intercourse with his neighbor's wife. "Moreover thou shalt not lie carnally with thy neighbour's wife, to defile thyself with her." Leviticus 20:10 "And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death." Deuteronomy 22:23 extends this prohibition to a man sleeping with a woman who is engaged to be married. If a man has an affair with an unmarried woman, the act is not considered adultery. Married men were free to visit prostitutes. A man who committed adultery did not commit a wrongful act against his own wife, but rather against his male neighbor. Leviticus 27:6 A child aged 1 month to five years of age was worth 5 shekels if a boy and 3 shekels if a girl. "And if it be from a month old even unto five years old, then thy estimation shall be of the male five shekels of silver, and for the female thy estimation shall be three shekels of silver." Numbers 3:15 shows that a census counted only male infants over the age of one month, boys and men. "Number the children of Levi after the house of their fathers, by their families: every male from a month old and upward shalt thou number them." Females were not considered worthy of being included. Numbers 5:11-31 describes a lengthy magical ritual that women were forced to perform if their husbands suspected them of having had an affair. A priest prepared a potion composed of holy water mixed with sweepings from the floor of the tabernacle. He proclaimed a curse over the potion and required the woman to drink it. If she were guilty, she would suffer greatly: her abdomen would swell and her thighs waste away. There is no similar magical test for husbands suspecting of having an affair with another woman. In Numbers 27:8-11, Moses describes the rules of inheritance that God has stated. If a man dies, his son inherits the estate; his daughter gets nothing. Only if there is no son, will his daughter inherit. If there are no children, then the estate is given to the man's brothers; his sister(s) get nothing. If he had no brother, the estate goes to his nearest male relative. "...If a man die, and have no son, then ye shall cause his inheritance to pass unto his daughter. And if he have no daughter, then ye shall give his inheritance unto his brethren. And if he have no brethren, then ye shall give his inheritance unto his father's brethren. And if his father have no brethren, then ye shall give his inheritance unto his kinsman that is next to him of his family...." Numbers 30 describes that a vow taken by a man is binding. But a vow taken by a woman can be nullified by her father, if she is still living in her family of origin, or by her husband, if she is married. Deuteronomy 21:10-13 describes how a soldier can force a woman captive to marry him without regard for her wishes. "When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the LORD thy God hath delivered them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them captive, And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy wife; Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house; and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails; And she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month: and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife." Deuteronomy 22:13-21 requires that a woman be a virgin when she is married. If she has had sexual relations while single in her father's house, then she would be stoned to death. There were no similar virginity requirements for men. "If any man take a wife, and go in unto her, and hate her, And give occasions of speech against her, and bring up an evil name upon her, and say, I took this woman, and when I came to her, I found her not a maid....if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel: Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you." Deuteronomy 22:28-29 requires that a virgin woman who has been raped must marry her attacker, no matter what her feelings are towards the rapist. "If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife...." Deuteronomy 24:1 describes the procedure for obtaining a divorce. This can only be initiated by the husband, not by the wife: "When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house." Deuteronomy 25:5-10: states that if a woman is widowed, she would be required to marry her former brother-in-law. This was called a "levirate" marriage. Their first-born son will later be considered to be the son of the deceased husband. The man could refuse to marry her. Women were not given a choice in the matter. " If brethren dwell together, and one of them die, and have no child, the wife of the dead shall not marry without unto a stranger: her husband's brother shall go in unto her, and take her to him to wife, and perform the duty of an husband's brother unto her." Deuteronomy 25:11: If two men are fighting, and the wife of one of them grabs the other man's testicles, her hand is to be chopped off. There is no penalty if a male relative were to grab the other man. "When men strive together one with another, and the wife of the one draweth near for to deliver her husband out of the hand of him that smiteth him, and putteth forth her hand, and taketh him by the secrets. Then thou shalt cut off her hand..." Judges 19:16-30 describes an event similar to Genesis 19. Some men in the city wanted to "know" a visiting Levite. The owner of the house offered his virgin daughter and the Levite's concubine so that the men could rape them. Verse 24 states: "Behold, here is my daughter a maiden, and his concubine; them I will bring out now, and humble ye them, and do with them what seemeth good unto you: but unto this man do not so vile a thing." The man sent his own concubine outside to the gang, who proceeded to serially rape her. She died of the attacks. The man only learned of her death when he was leaving the house in the morning and stumbled across her body. The woman was clearly considered expendable and of little value. 2 Chronicles 36:23 mentions the Second Temple which was constructed after some Jews returned from exile in Babylon. It was rebuilt by Herod late in the 1st century BCE. One of its features was women's court, considered the least sacred area. Next was the court of the Israelites (reserved for males), then the court of the Priests, and finally the Temple itself. The courts were laid out in this order to separate the women as far as possible from the Temple. THE STATUS OF WOMEN IN THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES (OLD TESTAMENT) PANTHER -> Site news ->
 
Tertullian, Women in Canon Law (1912) and Mulieris Dignitatem (1988) by Ysabel Howard - Tuesday, 4 October 2011, 09:17 PM
From time to time I murmur that Islam is NOT the winner of the prize for the world's most sexist religion. Christians and Muslims play a little game on the Web which goes 'We granted women such-and-such ever so many centuries before you did, so yah-boo'. Both sides studiously ignore the suppurating sexism and plain misogyny in their own traditions. Undoubtedly Catholics would have stoned adulteresses were it not for the awkward figure of Jesus in the way.
Book I Chapter I. Introduction. Modesty in Apparel Becoming to Women, in Memory of the Introduction of Sin into the World Through a Woman. Tertullian (ca. 155–230)If there dwelt upon earth a faith as great as is the reward of faith which is expected in the heavens, no one of you at all, best beloved sisters, from the time that she had first "known the Lord," [80] and learned (the truth) concerning her own (that is, woman's) condition, would have desired too gladsome (not to say too ostentatious) a style of dress; so as not rather to go about in humble garb, and rather to affect meanness of appearance, walking about as Eve mourning and repentant, in order that by every garb of penitence [81] she might the more fully expiate that which she derives from Eve,'the ignominy, I mean, of the first sin, and the odium (attaching to her as the cause) of human perdition. "In pains and in anxieties dost thou bear (children), woman; and toward thine husband (is) thy inclination, and he lords It over thee." [82] And do you not know that you are (each) an Eve? The sentence of God on this sex of yours lives in this age: [83] the guilt must of necessity live too. You are the devil's gateway: you are the unsealer [84] of that (forbidden) tree: you are the first deserter of the divine law: you are she who persuaded [85] him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack. You destroyed so easily God's image, man. On account of your desert'that is, death'even the Son of God had to die. And do you think about adorning yourself over and above your tunics of skins? [86] Come, now; if from the beginning of the world [87] the Milesians sheared sheep, and the Serians [88] spun trees, and the Tyrians dyed, and the Phrygians embroidered with the needle, and the Babylonians with the loom, and pearls gleamed, and onyx[1]stones flashed; if gold itself also had already issued, with the cupidity (which accompanies it), from the ground; if the mirror, too, already had licence to lie so largely, Eve, expelled from paradise, (Eve) already dead, would also have coveted these things, I imagine! No more, then, ought she now to crave, or be acquainted with (if she desires to live again), what, when she was living, she had neither had nor known. Accordingly these things are all the baggage of woman in her condemned and dead state, instituted as if to swell the pomp of her funeral.
 
 By 1912 what is essentially the same message had been stripped of the fear and loathing behind it. I. Ulpian (Dig., I, 16, 195) gives a celebrated rule of law which most canonists have embodied in their works: "Women are ineligible to all civil and public offices, and therefore they cannot be judges, nor hold a magistracy, nor act as lawyers, judicial intercessors, or procurators." Public offices are those in which public authority is exercised; civil offices, those connected otherwise with municipal affairs. The reason given by canonists for this prohibition is not the levity, weakness, or fragility of the female sex, but the preservation of the modesty and dignity peculiar to woman. For the preservation of this same modesty many regulations have been made concerning female apparel. Thus, women may not use male attire, a prohibition already found in the Old Testament (Deuteronomy 22:15). The canons add, however, that the assumption of the dress of men would be excusable in a case of necessity (Can. Quoniam 1, qu. 7), which seems to apply to the well-known case of Bl. Joan of Arc. Women must abstain from all ornament that is unbecoming in a moral sense (Can. Qui viderit, 13, c. 42, qu. 5). Some of the ancient Fathers are very severe on the practice of using pigments for the face. St. Cyprian (De habitu virg.) says: "Not only virgins and widows, but married women also, should, I think, be admonished not to disfigure the work and creature of God by using a yellow colour or black powder or rough, nor corrupt the natural lineaments with any lotion whatsoever." It is not held, however, to be a grave transgression when women ornament and paint themselves out of levity or vanity (St. Thomas, II[1]II:169:2), and if it is done with an upright intention and according to the custom of one's country or one's station in life, it is entirely unblameworthy (ibid., a. 1). Authors are even so benevolent as to say that if the face is painted to hide some natural defect, it is entirely licit, owing to the words of St. Paul (1 Corinthians 12:12, 14): "And such as we think to be the less honourable members of the body, about these we put more abundant honour; and those that are our uncomely parts have more abundant comeliness. But our comely parts have no need." Canonists strictly condemn female clothing that does not cover the person properly (Pignatelli, III, consult. 35), and Innocent XI issued an edict against this abuse in the city of Rome. ))))))))) The second branch of the woman question, which of necessity follows directly after that of gaining a livelihood, is that of a suitable education. The Catholic Church places here no barriers that have not already been established by nature. Fénelon expresses this necessary limitation thus: "The learning of women like that of men must be limited to the study of those things which belong to their calling; The difference in their activities must also give a different direction to their studies." The entrance of women as students in the universities, which has of late years spread in all countries, is to be judged according to these principles. Far from obstructing such a course in itself, Catholics encourage it. This has led in Germany to the founding of the "Hildegardisverein" for the aid of Catholic women students of higher branches of learning. Moreover, nature also shows here her undeniable regulating power. There is no need to fear the overcrowding of the academic professions by women. In the medical calling, which next to teaching is the first to be considered in discussing the professions of women, there are at the present time in Germany about 100 women to 30,000 men. For the studious woman as for others who earn a livelihood the academic calling is only a temporary position. The sexes can never be on an equality as regards studies pursued at a university. To complement this article, which was taken from the 1912 Catholic Encyclopedia, New Advent recommends a prayerful reading of Pope John Paul II's 1988 apostolic letter, "Mulieris Dignitatem."
 
PANTHER -> Site news -> Stoning: Deuteronomy is most explicit by Ysabel Howard - Friday, 4 February 2011, 01:49 AM And this and what follows... Chapter 22 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 If any man take a wife, and go in unto her, and hate her, -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 And give occasions of speech against her, and bring up an evil name upon her, and say, I took this woman, and when I came to her, I found her not a maid: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 Then shall the father of the damsel, and her mother, take and bring forth the tokens of the damsel's virginity unto the elders of the city in the gate: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16 And the damsel's father shall say unto the elders, I gave my daughter unto this man to wife, and he hateth her; --------------------------------------------------------------------------------17 And, lo, he hath given occasions of speech against her, saying, I found not thy daughter a maid; and yet these are the tokens of my daughter's virginity. And they shall spread the cloth before the elders of the city. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 And the elders of that city shall take that man and chastise him; -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 And they shall amerce him in an hundred shekels of silver, and give them unto the father of the damsel, because he hath brought up an evil name upon a virgin of Israel: and she shall be his wife; he may not put her away all his days. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20 But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 21 Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 22 If a man be found lying with a woman married to an husband, then they shall both of them die, both the man that lay with the woman, and the woman: so shalt thou put away evil from Israel. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 23 If a damsel that is a virgin be betrothed unto an husband, and a man find her in the city, and lie with her; -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 Then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall stone them with stones that they die; the damsel, because she cried not, being in the city; and the man, because he hath humbled his neighbor's wife: so thou shalt put away evil from among you. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing; there is in the damsel no sin worthy of death: for as when a man riseth against his neighbor, and slayeth him, even so is this matter: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 27 For he found her in the field, and the betrothed damsel cried, and there was none to save her. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 28 If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 29 Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days
 
I don’t suppose Mohammed read Tertulllian, but I expect he would have liked him if he had.
 
Where Islam got all its shit from: it is indeed Islamophobic, prejudiced and ill-informed to think that Islam invented stoning women, though the activity of half a brain cell applied to the New Testament would tell you that.
 
1 Jesus went unto the mount of Olives.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 And early in the morning he came again into the temple, and all the people came unto him; and he sat down, and taught them.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more
One reason and one reason only why the Christian governments of history did not stone women.
At least the accusers had integrity, were convicted by their own consciences. The vermin of UCH of course are incapable of self-examination, assume their perfection.
 I even told them about the SOE
THE SOE: NOW, BOYS, DON'T BE SILLY
Just another little reminder of reality, old boy. I really don't think it's a good idea for you to forget about the SOE. However, it seems that your stupidity and your insolence are such that you intend to be very silly indeed. The thing is, it would be awfully foolish to think 24-inch waist SAS is entirely a joke, to think, for instance, that women simply don't do that kind of thing and everyone knows (haw, haw, snigger, snigger) women don't do that kind of thing. On the contrary, the crustiest, most traditional retired general knows full well that women do do that kind of thing, and do it bloody well.
 
 Noor-un-Nisa Inayat Khan, GC, MBE, (1 January 1914, Moscow - 13 September 1944, Dachau concentration camp),usually known as Noor Inayat Khan, was a British Special Operations Executive agent in World War II of Hyderabadi(Indian) origin and the first female radio operator to be sent into occupied France to aid the French Résistance. AwardsGeorge Cross, MBE, Croix de Guerre, Mentioned in Dispatches Noor Inayat KhanFree Indian Sufi women fighting with the British against fascism would hardly be new.
 
Over half of First Aid Nursing Yeomanry's total strength was devoted to the work of Special Operations Executive(SOE) during WWII. One of FANYs members was the fiery Violette Szabo (née Violette Reine Elizabeth Bushell)(
'Louise' 
) who was the half-French daughter of a Brixton motor-car dealer and was said to be the best shot in the SOE.Mme. Szabo was posthumously awarded her George Cross in 1946 and it was received from the King by her 4-year olddaughter. (See SPECIAL FORCES, ROLL OF HONOUR)Leo Marks, who was the head of the Codes Section of the SOE, spoke of Violette almost with awe and devotes to her  parts of his recent memoir "Between Silk and Cyanide - The Story of SOE's Code War, 1941-1945" (HarperCollins).
 
Violette Szabo: History of this British SOE Agent
The First Aid Nursing Yeomanry (Princess Royal's Volunteer Corps) (FANY(PRVC) - pronounced Fanny) is a Britishindependent all-female unit and registered charity affiliated to, but not part of, the Territorial Army.It was formed as the First Aid Nursing Yeomanry in 1907 as a first aid link between the field hospitals and the frontlines, and was given the yeomanry title as all its members were originally mounted on horseback.In the Second World War, the F.A.N.Y. was formed into the initial driver companies of the Auxiliary Territorial Service,called the Women's Transport Service, and it also served as a parent unit for many women who undertook espionagework for the Special Operations Executive. Three of these (Odette Sansom, Violette Szabo and Noor Inayat Khan), were awarded the George Cross and Nancy Wa the George Medal for their service.[1]
 
FANYList of SOE agents - Pearl, Nancy, Krystyna, Lorraine, Marie, Noor...SOE included a number of women (who were often recruited from the First Aid Nursing Yeomanry); F Section alonesent 39 female agents into the field, of whom 13 did not return. The Valençay SOE Memorial was unveiled at Valençayin the Indre département of France on May 6, 1991, marking the fiftieth anniversary of the despatch of F Section's firstagent to France. The memorial's Roll of Honour lists the names of the 91 men and 13 women members of the SOE whogave their lives for France's freedom.SOE
 
Nancy Wake
Of course there were some pretty cool kittens in the earlier generations too. Meet Nancy Wake, o goons, to you of course just some stupid Sheila, awarded the George Medal, Légion d'honneur, Croix de Guerre, French Resistance Medal, US Medal of Freedom, Companion in the Order of Australia.
 
The White Mouse Nancy Wake was the Allies' most decorated servicewoman of WWII, and the Gestapo's most-wanted person. Theycode-named her 'The White Mouse'. When war broke out she was a young woman married to a wealthy Frenchman living a life of luxury in cosmopolitan Marseilles. She became a saboteur and Resistance fighter who led an army of 7,000 Maquis troops in guerrilla warfare to sabotage the Nazis. Her story is one of daring, courage and optimism in theface of impossible odds.In 1992 a television mini-series was made about her life. However the subject was irritated by historical liberties thatwere taken with her life story, such as showing her having an affair while working for the Resistance in Auvergne:"What do you think my bosses in England would have thought, all those thousands of pounds to train me and for me togo and have an affair. Really"!"The mini-series was well-acted but in parts it was extremely stupid. At one stage they had me cooking eggs and baconto feed the men. For goodness sake did the Allies parachute me into France to fry eggs and bacon for the men? There wasn't an egg to be had for love nor money, and even if there had been why would I be frying it when I had men to dothat sort of thing?" Nancy Wake's comrade Henri Tardivat perhaps best characterised the guerrilla chieftain: "She is the most femininewoman I know, until the fighting starts. Then, she is like five men."Full article here
Don't be a little silly, Nancy, get on with your flower-arranging, no-one can do anything, least of all you, you silly girl, for heaven's sake, you're a woman.  Look, you just have to do what you're told.

Fortunately for the free world, she didn't work at UCH among the cunt-face scum nutter filth of the earth, butchering, murdering psychopathic boneheaded offal whom you know as doctors and nurses
 
You, you sick evil old savage, you, Francis, do you not understand no-one gives a flying fuck about your insane intellectually absurd morally repulsive, psychopath pervert sick boy ravings.  Of course you understand, just as the filth-monkey Muslims understand, both of you just foul and obscene and deranged and insolent.  You got Troof and you are divinely appointed to impose it.  It simply doesn’t matter what other people think.  You own them.  You know best.  They’re just being insolent and self-willed to think they have a right to their own views.  Protecting your own, are you, the squirming obscene bag of pus that is the Good Catholic Woman.  Hardly expect an intellectual absurdity like you who regards people as sinful for not believing that for which there is not one scrap of evidence, and much of which the Church has made up, to care about truth or justice or reason or fact, a moral void who is supposed to represent Jesus and states it's normal to hit people because you don't like their words.  Of course what you are actually doing is sating their foul malice and doing your best to destroy me.
 
Given of course to the whore slag pus that everyone must understand that God sits above and everyone must be mindful of dribbling pervert vileness put into God’s mouth – if I were God, I’d sue.
Some people say they hate God, but they hate what they have been told God is.  There is no reason to think God exists and consequently no reason to thinks it subscribes to the views attributed to it.
 
Doubtless I’m supposed to take everything back.  A little hard, that, a little hard to take back the entire history of the free world, though of course nut-job whores manage well enough dismissing it into non-existence, every bloody basic necessary fact of history ignored.  Oh why does the silly little girl not get on with playing with her dolls.    Even harder to take back the history of me.  I mean, here I sit with pictures of my parents on the sideboard and a great many of their books and other possessions around me.  I can remember quite far back, too, Katie collecting me from school at Clarence Gate with the dogs and walking back across Regent’s Park, the flat in Regent’s Park Road, when I was 7/8ish.  Doubtless since it has been decided I don’t exist I’m expected to obediently imagine myself into non-existence. 
 
Psycho-sexual cripples.  A decent society would of course treat these mad old guys decently as they dribbled to themselves on park-benches, maybe recommend some counselling, have they got friends, relations, support – until they over-stepped the mark and became criminal, exposing themselves, sexual assault, rape. 
 
I gave the vermin a path through it all: I gave them PANTHER, but of course murder-machines whose sole aim is a society in which no-one may criticize their foul drivel dismissed it like everything else.
 
No, they’re not psychopaths, perverts, liars, butchers.  No, they’re not depraved, degraded, degenerates whose sole criterion for the governance of human affairs is power, violence, authority, no. thjey ‘re not whores who abandon all fact, reason, morality to please their masters, no, they’re not creatures of another’s  will and choosing, creatures who have abandoned being human, inadequates, intellectually and emotionally castrated, inorganic, devoid of integrity, principle, honour, self-respect and indeed sanity, no, no they’re good religious people, an asset to society.
 
Just so long as there’s no freedom and democracy and so no-one asks what, according to the criteria of the sane, is good about them.
 
I even told the vile filthy degenerate grovellers about respect.
 
Ain’t I got no respect
 
Ah, you noticed.  Certainly I am capable of respect, admiration, even awe, have heroines and heroes, though that still doesn't mean I disconnect my mind from the electricity supply. Violette Szabo, Odette Sansom, Noor Inayat Khan. Nancy Wake, Douglas Bader, Stephen Hawking, Jesus, for that matter, people who have overcome overwhelming odds, shown phenomenal courage and strength of character
Violette Szabo's award of the George Cross was published in the London Gazette on 17 December 1946: Madame Szabo volunteered to undertake a particularly dangerous mission in France. She was parachuted into France in April, 1944, and undertook the task with enthusiasm. In her execution of the delicate researches entailed she showed great presence of mind and astuteness. She was twice arrested by the German security authorities but each time managed to get away. Eventually, however, with other members of her group, she was surrounded by the Gestapo in a house in the south west of France. Resistance appeared hopeless but Madame Szabo, seizing a Sten-gun and as much ammunition as she could carry, barricaded herself in part of the house and, exchanging shot for shot with the enemy, killed or wounded several of them. By constant movement, she avoided being cornered and fought until she dropped exhausted. She was arrested and had to undergo solitary confinement. She was then continuously and atrociously tortured. But never by word or deed gave away any of her acquaintances or told the enemy anything of any value. She was ultimately executed. Madame Szabo gave a magnificent example of courage and steadfastness. Violette Szabo was also awarded the Croix de Guerre (France). Her husband, Lieutenant Etienne Szabo (Free French Forces), was killed in action at El Alamein on 24 October 1942.
http://www.stephen-stratford.co.uk/agentgcs.htm

That I admire.  That I am in awe of.  Sly, sordid, vindictive, squalid, dishonest, cowardly bestial cockroaches not.  Bags of rotting flesh on their knees selling themselves to the highest bidder, smirking, sniggering, infinitely corrupt, accepting anything as true and good not, psychopaths who think they own the rest of the human race not.  Traitors not.  Don't they shave the heads of collaborators? I expect I’m supposed to calm down.  Why should I calm down?  I have been treated despicably the repulsive, the traitor, the absolutely corrupt, the bestial, the thug, the butcher, the wannabe murderer, the liar, the coldly bestially evil who dismiss all fact, reason, morality, democracy and pretend to be academics, pretend to be doctors and nurses. I have been stripped of my health, stripped of control of my body, I can walk only with a four-wheeled walking frame, and even that is not enough for sexually demented pervert vermin who did this to me and who clearly insist I suffer for the rest of my life.  I have been thrown on the scrapheap and left to rot.  I need money.  I’ll calm down when I want to calm down.