Screw you….
 
Adam and Eve making wild passionate love.  Trafalgar Square dissolving into limitless galaxies.  The sky’s the limit. 
 
Yea, the finger of God shall trace across the sky e = mc2.  All the gods humanity has invented having complex conversations with each other.
 
Just so long as it’s clear to the filthy brutes of Rome, Riyadh and Teheran they do not drag England down into ignorance, irrationality,  perversion, psychosis, replace fact, reason, morality, democracy, the rule of law with the unaccountable dribblings of the raving mad.
 
The various wannabe dictators who will doubtless strut around be pursued by ‘Iron Man’.
 
More mundanely just ask ludicrous and repulsive creatures what the fuck is their problem?
 
Such as this Boden creature.  Get it on camera.  Ask it just what is its problem?  What is Linch’s bloody problem?  A mad perverted animal that thinks my body is its problem, to do with what it chooses. 
 
Incapable, the slave-slut filth, incapable of standing upright, the chains are too short to let them, incapable of standing independent, distinct, free, and telling their precious masters to go fuck themselves.
 
Spread their legs.  Use me, o Master.  Let me be the instrument of your will and purpose.  Whatever you say, o Master.
 
In the sad twisted dirty animal brains of the slave=sluts, the damaged goods, it beats that anything Master commands must be The Good, as anything he dribbles must be Truth, no matter how evidently evil or false, he knows best, it is not for them to presume to question, that is insolent, self-willed, impertinent.
 
I’m supposed to take these creatures seriously, regard them as rational sentient beings?  Respect creatures who behave like this?
 
Respect sick animals impervious to all fact, reason, morality, unreachable by human means, unreachable by love and mind, who live in some mad mental world that exists only between their ears.
 
In which of course ‘respect’ for sick animals, for the insolently openly criminal, for creatures who break any law on the statute book in order to further their destruction of democracy, creatures who skulk behind closed doors, creatures who have no use for language or reason but ‘communicate’ by brute force, is paramount.
 
‘Respect’ so-called doctors and nurses who find a spectator sport the physical abuse of a woman who has had major spinal surgery, a woman with a metal rod in my back, a woman about whom they have had a letter from the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital,
 
Creatures with the mental processes of a bubnormal three-year-old, who think their ludicrous kind incapable of lying, incapable of error, incapable of ignorance.
 
Oh but they’re good people.  They’re religious. They’re o-bee-diyunt.  They do what they’re told.  They believe what they’re told.  They aren’t actually human at all.
 
Deliberately left at the mercy of these filthy grotesques, deliberately left to be butchered and destroyed, no question of anyone getting me out of there, or taking any other measures to get their filthy infected claws out of me. 
 
On no account should I have been left free to continue my existence as me in the mental world of C21st England.  Some sexually and otherwise mutilated mad ape they call the Holy Farter for=bds t!  I must be punished!  Of course the dirty monkey is impotent, has no facts or reason to persuade me, merely jabbers it got this book see, it got Troof.   This book it got is God’s Holy Word.  IIt is not to be mocked!  t’s stupid as well as a liar. 
 
As I have said, start at the beginning which piece of puerile and or perverted drivels should the sane not mock first, the bit about the world being created in seven days, the sexually diseased story of how woman brought into the world, the loony tunes nutjob bit about woman being derived from Adam’s rib. 
 
Should we move on to Leviticus and the bit about coneys being an abomination?  Or how about the solid stuff in Deuteronomy about stoning women  Move on further.  God saw a nice Jewish girl and decided to inseminate her an’ the Son of God was born in a stable, an’ wise men came to bring him gifts.  It’s a very pretty story but literally true, you cannot be serious.  And he was a nice guy who thought people should love one another and nasty guys got the Romans to crucify him and he rose from the dead and descended into Hell.  Do not get me on the harrowing of hell, it’s gorgeous.  Believe it?  Nutters.
 
Take it seriously.  Doesn’t it all just have to be treated as though it’s something the normally sane should take seriously.  Anyone who spoutd any of this drivel is to be respected, deferred to. 
 
Only the insane matter, those divorced from reality.
 
And so I should abandon all fact, all reason, all morality, I should erase from the mind everything I have read or thought or felt contrary to the ravings of the insane,  I should become a creature of the will and choosing of my masters, knowing nothing other than their will, being nothing other than an instrument of their purpose. 
 
Or of course keep my fucking marf shut cos if I fucking don’t arbitrary, cowardly unaccountable skulking cowardly dirty animals, apes with clubs,  will attempt to break my back.
 
I just have to undertint that the ravings of psychopaths are vastly more important than the sayings of Buddha, the work of Einstein, than anything Balzac or Plato or Greer or Friedan or Sartre or Shakespeare or any other of a thousand writers had to say about the human condition,  The ravings of psychopaths who belong in cages trump the majestic edifice of checks and balances that is the free world.
 
And of course I have to understand that I am a woman.  Two roles are open to me, a mother or a virgin.  I have rejected both.  I am therefore clearly some kind of deviant.  Undoubtedly I fail to understand my business was on my back breeding.  I may not think my body my own to do with as I choose, any more than I may think my mind my own.  I am a piece of property, a slave-girl to be thrown around as my masters wish.   I must of course deny all evident reality, and every fact of history.  None of these things happened in the world of the nutjob.  I must deny the reality of the town around me, its pagans, Buddhists, humanist, atheists, physicist, philosophers.  Thus some courses from the University of Sussex
 
Physics and Astronomy
Astrophysics MPhys
Physics BSc (Hons)
Physics MPhys
Physics (research placement) MPhys
Physics (with an industrial placement year) BSc (Hons)
Physics (with an industrial placement year) MPhys
Physics and Astronomy (with a foundation year) BSc (Hons)
Physics with Astrophysics BSc (Hons)
Physics with Astrophysics MPhys
Theoretical Physics BSc (Hons)
Theoretical Physics MPhys
In nutjob spassoby world we all accept the cosmology of Bible and blessed with the pristeine ignorance they so prize whereby we don’t even know how a kettle boils.
 
Of course the Brighton Naturist Beach of the Parade of the Mermaids does not exist, any more than Brighton in a normal summer.  We are all ashamed of our bodies, hysterical if flesh is exposed, and at all times dress modestly.
 
Hey freak sickjob, breast, do they freak you, sickjob kinky-boy, nutjob, must a woman conceal the shape of her body because of sickboy perverts like you.
 
Hologram of nudes, gays making love – oh no, wait, we could have real0time, have love-ins.  Laugh in the faces of the creepy sickboy pervs who think sex is evil, women are evil, bodies are evil, people should be cut off from their bodies. 
 
Screaming nutjobs who think everyone else is their property, to e controlled by them, no-one has any autonomy, because of course they are severely unstable, because their twisted dirty little monkey brains cannot cope with things being different to the model between their ears they  call Troof, and which is therefore fixed impervious to external phenomena.  Nothing else is real to them.  Impotent and incontinent, intellectually and emotionally helpless, incapable of either self-command, changing what they think and feel,  or self-control, containing what they think and feel, hitting out at the source of the threat.  Devoid of love, devoid of mind.  Animal.  Hate love and mind in equal measure.  Both of course primarily threaten themselves.  If they started to love other human being as the unique individual each of us is, they’d stop thinking we’re their property, pawns on their chessboard to do and be and think and write and say what they desire, if they started to think they would question the sick drivel between their ears.  That is supposed to be being holy.
 
: liberty is a function of love; control is a function of self-will. The level on which it all fits together is not only accessible to atheists, but acceptable to atheists; God is not a necessary precursor. Then again, if we want to keep it simple, religion is two things, from one of which follows liberty and from the other fascism.
You are not self-forgetting by definition if you are forcing others to obey you. Grace is paramountly not forcing oneself on others other than to restrain them from forcing themselves on others. To love one's neighbour as oneself is not to inflict beliefs he or she finds questionable on him or her. People are and have to be free to go wherever they might be going. Society's business is limited to demanding they behave tolerably to each other and ensuring they are free to travel. We do not know.

If the nutjobs will not retreat, then I guess we just  have to screw their brains.
 
Quite offensive to God really to claim he as the author pf these books, can’t make up his mind, gets things wrong, completely ignorant of the universe he’s supposed to have created.
 
REALITY 101
The roots of our current ills are sustained attacks on reality. Cries that absolute truth does not exist are used to deny the absolutes of reality. Leftists twitter about relativism and conditioning without having the faintest idea what they are talking about.
Reality is what is. It doesn’t shift or bend. It may change with time. It is reality that Mr Cameron is Prime Minister and Mr Obama is President. In the future both will have ceased to hold these current positions.  They will not cease to be male members of humanity.  They will not become 20 years old on their 70th birthdays.

Reality is what is. What is need not be either true or physically real. What is includes all the ideas in the world and all the products of human imagination. You do not have to believe in the Virgin Mary, Allah or Quetzalcoatl to acknowledge the concepts the Virgin Mary, Allah and Quetzalcoatl exist and have informed the development of the societies in which they dominated and dominate.
Reality is fact. It is fact that some people think Christianity nonsensical and others are devout believers. It is a common obfuscation that to state that some people think Christianity nonsensical is to state that Christianity is nonsensical, that to acknowledge the existence of, the right to speak and write of, those who think Christianity nonsensical is to uphold the proposition that Christianity is nonsensical.
 Reality is everything that is and everything that human beings have thought and shared with others, both the facts of science and the dogmas of religion. Reality is the sum of subjective realities. Reality is the diversity of views human beings hold and have held. Reality is everything that might be relevant, that which has to be taken account of because societies become skewed if it is not. Within a single free society people arrive at diametrically opposing positions, some devoutly religious, others fervently atheist. Reality is that a doctrine that is ridiculous and offensive lies to one person is gospel truth to another. Authoritarian, totalitarian and often frankly murderous societies are those in which only one aspect of reality is permissible and the existence of other aspects is denied, are those in which the version of reality of one human, whether Marx, Mohammed or Mussolini, is imposed and identified as all-encompassing.
Behaviours and policies increase the level of reality in a society or diminish it. Reality 101 teaches that large gulfs exist between individuals in ability and moral sense, unbridgeable canyons yawn between individuals in beliefs and interests. Further, individuals are not fixed. They may develop their ability, moral sense, change their opinions, develop interests in subjects that previously bored them. When people are free to be themselves, these differences show. Outside the fundy orthodox, whether religious or not, probably no two people think exactly the same thing about the universe or about the NHS. This gives rise to genuine plurality, where people hold directly opposing opinions. Since there are no grounds for believing that some people have a greater right to be than others, everyone has an equal right to the views of the unique individual she or he. People are free to the extent they do not impinge on the freedom of others. Thinking one thing and saying it does not inhibit someone else from thinking the opposite and saying it, though numerous cavorting idiots can be found to claim it does. Those who lack moral sense are not free to steal, murder, rape. Those who lack intelligence are self-limited - there are things they cannot do or be. If they do do them, in a free society they are outdistanced by those who do them better, unless of course individual expansion is ‘restrained‘, as Tawney put it. People who are good at making money are going to have more than people who are not. Households with two incomes are better off than those with one.  Couples are therefore a major cause of financial inequality.  A single man earning 15K may be  surviving. If his girlfriend gets pregnant, he is faced with paying for not two but three on 15K. He walks away, leaving two of the three seriously poor. A major cause of  child poverty is not inequality, class, background or privilege, but sex.
REALITY 102
There is not only one book in the world defining reality. A belief-system is simply a collection of ideas that seem to make more sense to someone than other collections of ideas. Some people (they know who they are) claim everything is enshrined in their One Book, with the resultant claim that everything was fixed in one time and one place. The historical Moses is thought to have lived in around 1400 BC. In the 1500 years or so between him and Paul, a multiplicity of world-shaping events and perspectives on being human occurred elsewhere on the planet, the whole of Ancient Greece and with it the birth of democracy, most of Classical Rome, the Upanishads, Confucius, Zoroastrianism, Lao-Tzu, none of which is significant to the orthodox Christian, other than as error or sin or at best feeble gropings for troof. This is first order lunacy: discuss. It worked when there was no mass communication, when the nearest city was an alien land many leagues distant. It doesn’t work now.

It is worth being precise about what hardly anyone believes, because actually it is possible to be entirely precise about what people do not believe, whether they be hard-line materialist atheists or flutterby flower-children. We do not believe there is only one book in the world. We are not a largely illiterate society of desert tribesmen thousands of years ago to whom one book was an all-encompassing explanation. We live in a society with access to millions of books and other sources of information; if we do not read much, we may surf or watch Life on Earth. We form our views based on what we read together with our experience of other human beings. We do not believe one book dictates what we must think; clearly millions of books, the content of which is contradictory, cannot dictate what anyone thinks.

Where the content of books conflicts with reality, we do not believe reality is necessarily over-ruled. Where the content of books contains ideas conflicting with ideas in a 'holy book', we do not believe the 'holy book' necessarily true and other books false.

Indeed, we live in a society shaped by a Trinity, that Trinity being broadly symbolized by the combined content of the Philosophy, Religion and Science sections of a major bookshop.

We may prefer to believe that which is demonstrably false or distinctly less likely but on the whole I think have an awareness of the thing called fact; one of the things that distinguishes the  insane religious from the sane is whether he or she accords the Virgin Birth or Mohammed's Night Journey the status of fact, on par with water boiling when heated sufficiently.

Clearly also people who read many books, the content of which is contradictory, come across views that repel or otherwise offend them and do not run around screaming and shouting about it.

It being the case that some views on life the universe and everything directly oppose others, unless you live in a hole in the ground you are going to meet people who think what you think is nonsense.  If you then cavort and scream a) you are mad and b) your ignorance, your self-obsession and your total intellectual and emotional inadequacy are your problem. You seek to annul the external source of your distress because you have neither self-control (ability to contain your feelings) nor self-command (ability to change your feelings).
REALITY 103
Either you decide in advance what the world is and what the individual humans in it are and when they fail to be it coerce them into being it or kill them if they are recalcitrant or your frame of reference dictates their category of human has no right to life or you look at the world and the individual humans in it and what they do and have done and say and have said and form conclusions therefrom. Either you categorize humans according to their external appearance (form) and declare women or Jews or Arabs or gays are fundamentally a different kind of human to you or you start with the proposition that all are fundamentally human (essence).

Those who believe in One Book, One Truth, whether that book is the Bible, the Qur’an, the Torah, Das Kapital or Mein Kampf prejudge and of course deny all evidence to the contrary, whether scientific or social. The authors of these works have created the world as they think it must be or if you prefer have created fictional worlds. The rest in a nutshell is their lamentable struggle to fit the real world into the box they have created for it.
There are single, absolute realities. A grain of sand has the properties of sand. It is not a malign entity seeking to infiltrate your sandwiches at a beach-party. Everything is itself, not what it ‘must be’ or you imagine it is, has its essence independent of how coded perception sees it. The unique identity of an individual may be less obvious, not least to the individual himself or herself. People play roles and seek to cast others in them.

The human capacity to deny reality is pretty limitless. When you have dismissed the observable evidence of what people say and do, you are finally happy living in a world that unfortunately exists only in your head and you can truly dedicate yourself to protecting that inner world from any encroachment by reality, because you think you'll fall apart. Emotional maturity is knowing that you won't fall apart.
Some people wish to live in the C21st. The modern world is based on reality.

 1. The reality of individuality. Modern people are not obsessed with               race, gender or sexual orientation.

 2. The reality of one world. We sit in Surbiton and talk to people in               Singapore, San Francisco and Sierra Leone, whether on the               telephone or over the Web. We understand the world is a single               ecological unit. We understand we're all just people. We live in a               free and borderless world called cyberspace. We read and watch               and say what we like. We communicate with each other as               equals.
REALITY 104
Perception is conditioned from birth onward as the small and screaming I seeks to deal with the world. Internal realities are formed of what people are, what situations means – mind-patterns, concepts of ‘I’ and ‘you’ and ‘I’ in relation to ‘you’ - stereotypes at the most elementary level. All irtubi are vicious, and so, if I should meet an irtubi, he or she will attempt to injure me. If that is my conviction and I meet a charming, courteous, irtubi, I conclude he or she is feigning pleasantness, suspect him or her of setting some trap for me. Conflict is set up when experience of people, situations – external reality – fails to conform to one’s internal reality. It may be repressed. Alternatively one may make minimal adjustment to the head-set. The mind is very flexible in this respect. All irtubi are vicious. My friend is irtubi. My friend is not vicious. He is the exception that proves the rule – a peculiarly meaningless expression. The brain’s attempts to order the world, order the input, have resulted in false conclusions. The brain has sought to protect itself from what is there. What is there may hurt. We talk freely of people feeling threatened. There is no physical danger. The rickety concepts on which the ‘I’, the self-image, is based are under attack. It may seem strange to say it is essential to personality that one believe for instance that all irtubi are vicious. Nonetheless, the self, the sense of self, may be made up of similar deeply held convictions, and when one foundation-stone is in danger of being pulled away one fears for the whole building.

True loss of self, not the dirty perverted kind purveyed by the clerical ape, which means accepting his lies, lies in ceasing to code perception and seeing what is there, such that there is no ‘I’ between oneself and the universe, the inside equals the outside.
Bloody thousands, millions of versions of the world around us and its inhabitants.  People have directly opposing opinions and think the other guy is alking drivel and pernicious drivel at that.  You subscribe to one rather than the other?  Fine, but that does not mean you conduct yourelves like a yerical baboon because others don’t.  We all have an equal right to our views.  Someone should tell Her Majesty’s Government. 
 
Mentally these bloody priest creatures do indeed reside in the Middle Ages: they speak as though peoole had no other points of reference, there are no books, televisions, there is no Internet.  They expect to be the source of all, the tit on which the slave-garbage hang, the scourse of all truth and good. 

No other points of reference at all, not even the Bible.
 
From the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1997):


2087 Our moral life has its source in faith in God who reveals his love to us. St. Paul speaks of the "obedience of faith"9 as our first obligation. He shows that "ignorance of God" is the principle and explanation of all moral deviations.10
 
From the inauguration of Cardinal Nichols:
At the installation of the Most Rev Vincent Nichols at Westminster Cathedral, his predecessor, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, described a lack of faith as “the greatest of evils” and blamed atheism for war and destruction, implying that it was a greater evil even than sin itself.....
 
In his homily he said: “Faith in God is not, as some would portray it today, a narrowing of the human mind or spirit. It is precisely the opposite. “Faith in God is the gift that takes us beyond our limited self, with all its incessant demands . . . Some today propose that faith and reason are crudely opposed, with the fervour of faith replacing good reason. This reduction of both faith and reason inhibits not only our search for truth but also the possibility of real dialogue.”
Cardinal Murphy-O’Connor went farther. Referring to the battles that will be won and lost in the effort to sustain the Christian presence in secular society, he said: “What is most crucial is the prayer that we express every day in the Our Father, when we say ‘deliver us from evil’. The evil we ask to be delivered from is not essentially the evil of sin, though that is clear, but in the mind of Jesus it is more importantly a loss of faith. For Jesus, the inability to believe in God and to live by faith is the greatest of evils.
“You see the things that result from this are an affront to human dignity, destruction of trust between peoples, the rule of egoism and the loss of peace. One can never have true justice, true peace, if God becomes meaningless to people.”
From The Times, 22nd May 2009, now behind a paywall
 
To the harmless civilized atheist of course belief in God may seem the principle and explanation of all moral deviations; to many, whether Christian or not, it would seem that on the contrary faith may underpin the clamourings of the limited self, claiming the forcing of its incontinent urges on others has divine sanction; it is love that takes us beyond them. 
 
A modest Christian education recalls 1 Corinthians:
 
1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. 2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. 3And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.
 
13 And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
 
Perhaps at a later date Their Eminences might take this up with Paul, that same Paul?
 
Galatians 5:14 For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself
Matthew 22:37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38 This is the first and great commandment.
39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
 
Mark 12:30 And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment.
31 And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these
What Jesus of course understood is that it’s not enough to tell people to love God.  They will continue to treat their fellow humans like shit unless they are equally categorically told to love their fellow humans. 
 
Understood something else too: what absolute shit the supposed holy can be:
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness . Matthew 23:27
Bags of shit, yes.
 
They have their slaves on chains jumping to obey when they crack the whip, assume everyone else is a slave too,  They are incapable of emerging from the foul morass of psychosis between their ears and seeing others as equals, individuals, distinct, running on separate tracks, an entirely different collection of thoughts, feelings, experiences, knowledge.  People have no right to be themselves.  Individuality is to be beaten out of us, literally.  Shan’t I just fall on my knees and begin to cower, ape, beg for mercy, ape, anything you say, ape, only please don’t hurt my back, ape.
 
Such is the world of the evil nutjob raving nutter warmly embraced by politicians, security services, the University in which we are now all supposed to dwell, into the infected claws of which they delivered me.
 
Thanks for the suggestion I become a mindless animal, a creature of your making, but I’d really far rather be me, intelligent, learned, witty, literate, female me.  Love the notion I’m unacceptable in my own country.  You just get funnier and funnier.  Ridiculous little animals.
But they are adamant!  They are unswerving!  They are unyielding!  I should crawl to a foul putrid heap of infected shit.
Ooh naow, you can’t say nuffink, Master wouldn’t like that.  A constant external referent, standing over one
I am supposed to be meek, obedient, docile and of course silent in this monstrous travesty of England created by traitors.  Doubtless I should lower my eyes in the presence of my self-appointed superiors and of course not speak unless spoken to, bob a curtsey to Miss Nurse.  I don’t have masters and mistresses, slave-monkeys.  This is England.  All that stands above any of us is the law, the rule of law, under which we are all equal.
ABOVE THE LAW?
 
Great goodness, no, they are the law. They decree. The purpose of the law is to be the instrument of their will.  It is unthinkable to them they be subject to the law.  The law to them in short is exactly what Marx and Engels said it was, an instrument of oppression.   The law to the sick animal exists solely to silence dissent and keep the rebellious serfs in order, enable him or her to continue being a disgusting criminal in peace.
 
Law, morality, religion, are to him so many bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests.
Marx and Engels:  The Manifesto of the Communist Party
 
(Should I put that in terms  even anyone as stupid as a politician of the Left can understand?  A lad or lass who has caused trouble at’ mill is prosecuted with lots of big important-sounding words, the full majesty of the law, sedition, but that against which he or she has protested is ignored, let alone criticized, corrected or of course criminal charges brought against it.)
 
This, what is the term, I’m honestly not sure but think it might be status quo ante, is what the beyond hilarious fascist fake Left falls over itself to demand.
 
Any ludicrous ramblings about a free and democratic society and equality before the law are dismissed as excuses for disobedience. Because they are raving fucking mad. It is inconceivable to them they be prosecuted: they have simply done what is right and just and necessary and best.
 
Best for whom?  Blair’s bank balance?  Their private patients from Saudi and the Gulf?  The future of British women?
 
Abuses by King John caused a revolt by nobles who compelled him to execute this recognition of rights for both noblemen and ordinary Englishmen. It established the principle that no one, including the king or a lawmaker, is above the law.
http://www.constitution.org/eng/magnacar.htm
Is some part of that unclear?
39. No freemen shall be taken or imprisoned or disseised or exiled or in any way destroyed, nor will we go upon him nor send upon him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.
40. To no one will we sell, to no one will we refuse or delay, right or justice.
How about that?
The law I break, certainly, laws made by traitors by slaves that would silence me.
 
The law I break nothing like as much as they do.  The law I break because the law has rejected protecting me criminals, psychopaths and traitors. 
 
A world in which the only criminal is supposed to be me for naming criminals and reviling them.
They don’t like that at all.
 
They are good people.
 
Conspiracy to pervert the course of justice
Conspiracy to overthrow democracy
Conspiracy to overthrow the rule of law
Giving aid and comfort to the enemies of Queen
Causing grievous bodily harm
Suppressing material fact
Think I can throw in using coercion to attempt to make me perjure myself, say things I know are not true.
Attempting my mental and physical destruction
Numerous offences against gender.
Yeah, right, such good people. 
 
And they expected me to cower in front of law that protects heaps of shit?  With my background?
 
Communists make no mechanical division between legality and illegality under the conditions of bourgeois rule. They are not opposites, but different moments in the development of the class struggle.Democratic rights under capitalism are not granted by the generosity of the ruling class. Nor are they inherent in the system. They have been won by struggle in the face of fierce opposition by generation after generation of working people.Draft Programme of the CPGB
Oh how many of their silly laws have I broken, laws made by traitors for slaves.
OK, I did the good little bourgeois stuff.  So you expected me to continue behaving like a nervous little law-abiding bourgeoise, did you, in the face of your total criminality?  You wanted ‘no rules’, fuckers, you got ‘no rules’.  I like to think it wrong-footed them.  I was of course already raw from what happened at the Royal Free, to which you will recall my reaction was that of Fiver in the Death Warren.  People of my background do not I think make a habit of running to MI5, even if it’s only to say, “Hazel, Hazel, they’re the wrong kind of snow.” Indeed I have little doubt the version of those events and of me that is standard form is that propagated by Professor Dame Bellatrix and any fact I disseminate is regarded as lies since it fails to agree, checking verifiable fact being beyond the ability of the assembled company.
Oh, I really mean it, Bellatrix, I surely do.
I can actually be polite to my political enemies?  Well, I could, not sure if I can.  When you’ve said something a couple of thousand times to no response whatever (except of course insolent bestiality and criminality) pretty well what’s left to say is, “Oh just get fucked, you ludicrous vile little animal.”
And so we have a new Nazi-Soviet Pact and those who would have been at home in the Waffen SS raise the red flag. What my parents and grand-parents would have wanted me to do? No, it's what my parents and grand-parents would have assumed I'd do.

Thus an old Labour man spaketh unto Blair from beyond the grave.  Contemptible of course so-called Marxists upholding religious fascism, but of course all they want is the destruction of bourgeois morality, bourgeois democracy, bourgeois liberty and the rule of violent ignorant irrational animals, aka the dictatorship of the proletariat, except of course what it actually is is the dictatorship of a criminal underclass.  We’ll just forget millions of working-class people who behave reasonably, don’t lie, don’t cheat, don’t steal, don’t hit people, are curious about the world around them and even uphold freedom and democracy.  Bourgeois conditioning, comrades, bourgeois conditioning!
 
Do these dribbling crackpot freaks really believe atheism is forbidden, because it is by their dribbling crackpot freak religions?  Probably, yes.  My father was an atheist.  My grandfather was an atheist.  Pretty much undoubtedly Uncle Richard and Cousin Rodney were atheists, being card-carrying members of the Communist Party, a take on life, the universe and everything which of course wasn’t forbidden either.  There is a number of fault-lines here.  One of course is what happens when Communists learn their little religious pals want being an atheist or a Communist made illegal. 
[[[TO DENY ALMIGHTY GOD!]]]  Your god, fuck-faces, who on earth would want to be associated with such an entity?
 
Prpbably drivel, “Sure it’s a Christian country, isn’t it,” as though that meant it was ruled by the Vatican.  Actually not particularly, more so when this started.  Probably draw a graph of the decline in formal religion plotted against the rise in mad mouthings by the ‘holy’.   Probably a bit unfair to the CofE since many of these mad mouthings came from mad mouth Catholics and Muslims, but of course the CofE earned itself no points over women and gay priests.
 
When they have finished dribbling, “Everyone believes in God”, they should try to take on board that ‘everyone’ does not, that 50% of the country describes itself as having no religion, and that is an awful lot of people.  But of course their insolence, their arrogance is beyond bloody belief.  Whatever we think, we’re going to obey them.
 
Poor sick sad little monkeys.  You’d think the Vatican had the intelligence to tell them they’re writing a suicide-note but of course the sick sad little monkeys of the Vatican are probably top of the list for dribbling ‘everyone believes in God’, being wholly divorced from the reality of England.