Leche-culs
Look at this string of blood=stained mucus.  Could be any of them, Blair, Hughes, Yong, Linch.  Precisely what is so inexpressibly vile about it, so absolutely dirty, is it prostrates itself to power, force, violence, it recognizes no other criteria for the ordering of human affair, language, reason mean nothing to it.  Some creature brings its club down on my spinal fusion and they are incapable of stopping it, all they see is power and a threat to their filthy little animal selves, all that beats in their filthy little primate brains is the desire to appease a bigger monkey, they fall over themselves to please, it doesn’t occur to them to tell the sick animal to fuck off, to demand the public establishing of the facts, to refuse to let it cripple me.  How can we be helpful, o master, cripple her, that’s a brilliant idea, o master, we can certainly do that, o master, destroy her, well, that is completely wow, o master, of course we’ll destroy her for you, o master, and of course they expect me to do the same, faced with a sick brute that belongs in Broadmoor I am expected to fall on my knees and beg to please it, beg forgiveness for having incurred its wrath and of course beg it not to hurt my spine.  They are completely and utterly revolting, vile, obscene. They think people should live on our knees.  If we’re not grovelling to our dirty animal selves, begging to please ourselves by making out being vile and vicious and psychotic is the will of God which we just have to  obey, we’re grovelling to some fellow human, oh how desperately they hate anyone upright and all the pathetic baboon words they have for it, wilful, insolent, arrogant.  Doubtless I am supposed to be ‘entitled’.  I’m fucking entitled all right, vermin, I am entitled to full ownership of my body and mind, I am not your fucking property you disgusting apes, my body is not your toy to break to sate your bottomless malice and psychosis.  I say what I think, not what a sick fuck has told me I'm permitted to think.

And they and their masters are clinically insane.  I was left to be crippled and destroyed by Blair and Milburn in the hands of those wholly and completely divorced from the reality of the society around them.  I called it once living in teapots.  All that means anything to them is the inside of the teapot. They are more perfectly and utterly mad than some poor person in a psychiatric hospital who merely thinks he’s Napoleon.  Their ignorance is impenetrable.  They know. 

Thus also of course it was obvious for years that I was failing to penetrate that ignorance, as of course it was obvious what was happening to my body, but of course they had to be left free to cripple me and attempt to destroy me.  Blair, Hughes, Yong, Linch, none of them would hear of anything else.

The French have a word for them. 
 
lèche-cul , nom masculin 
Sens 
De manière vulgaire, désigne une personne extrêmement servile envers des responsables ou supérieurs hiérarchique, dans le but de se faire bien voir ou accorder certaines faveurs.  
 
Arse-lickers 
 
Liberty is a function of love.  Control is a function of self-will. 
 
You are not self-forgetting by definition if you are forcing others to obey you, placing to the fore the seedy clamourings of your self. Similarly 'God's mercy' is an exercise in self-stroking, whether attributed to God or claimed by the religious, a sitting there stroking yourself at how virtuous you are being because you are 'showing mercy'. If you love other people, you don't want to do that from which you are 'mercifully' refraining in the first place. 
Self-forgetting is graciousness, as in beauty of manner. Grace is paramountly not forcing oneself on others other than to restrain them from forcing themselves on others. 
If it’s not demonstrable, it can’t be binding. It is critical to today's intellectual corruption that realities that exist only in people's heads, whether their strange notions of the universe or their convictions of their own probity or intelligence in the face of the evidence, must be treated as sacrosanct, regarded with awe and 'respect;, considered superior to the findings of fact and reason 
If you have love and the universe, you do not need God. You may have God anyway. It is not the concept of God that is a problem, but a fantasy universe populated with fantasy clones and the fascists who attempt to impose on others. 
To love one’s neighbour as oneself is not to force one’s grubby itsy-bitsy self upon him or her. It is not necessary to believe in the Christian or any other revelation to attempt to love one’s fellow beings. 
 
The only sense in which the religious freak regards others as another self is as an extension of himself or herself to be and do and say and think what he or she is and does and says and thinks: property 
 
Religions, large or small, whatever propitiation of gods cavemen engaged in, were an explanation of the world.  Cultures met, often fruitfully.  Whatever knowledge of the world outside its particular teapot a community had depended on war, conquest, trade, exploration, and men who had sailed the seven seas coming back home to their remote villages. Then there were books and newspapers for those who could read.  Then there were  science, radio and flight
Religion is no longer necessary as an explanation of the world.  Science doesn’t have all the answers, but religion has no answers at all, only others’ imaginings.
 
Courses in Physics offered by the University of Sussex in Brighton

Physics and Astronomy

Astrophysics MPhys Physics BSc (Hons) Physics MPhys Physics (research placement) MPhys Physics (with an industrial placement year) BSc (Hons) Physics (with an industrial placement year) MPhys Physics and Astronomy (with a foundation year) BSc (Hons) Physics with Astrophysics BSc (Hons) Physics with Astrophysics MPhys Theoretical Physics BSc (Hons) Theoretical Physics MPhys
Welcome to Brighton, a plural and diverse community

If we all just get the hang of the idea that 'plural and diverse' does not mean 'believes in one of the 'Abrahamic faiths'', we might live happily ever after.  Nor of course does it mean is a paid-up member of any one belief-system but very much means people like me who take ideas from all over.

Organisations:
Anyone with a scientific outlook would probably enjoy Cafe Scientifique - “a place where, for the price of a cup of coffee or a glass of wine, anyone can come to explore the latest ideas in science and technology”. Similarly, Philosophy in Pubs, “a group of like-minded people searching for philosophical stimulation in a relaxed atmosphere” comes highly recommended, as does Skeptics in the Pub (in Brighton, Lewes, Eastbourne, Worthing and Horsham). Nerd Nite ("Like the Discovery Channel™…with Beer!") also takes place in Brighton, as does Sunday Assembly Brighton, "A godless congregation that meets monthly to hear great talks, sing songs and generally celebrate life".
http://www.brightonhumanists.org/other_organisations.html
 
Brighton Humanists
Living Without Religion. Challenging Religious Privilege.
To download our most recent newsletter, click here

We meet on the first Wednesday of every month except August,
 
The School of Tai Chi Chuan and Internal Arts
Qi School
https://shenlongtaichi.co.uk/

https://brightonmosque.co.uk/

Shri Swaminarayan Mandir, Brighton is a Swaminarayan Hindu Temple located in the Portslade area of the city of Brighton and Hove, on the south east coast of England. Inaugurated on 19 September 1999, the 10th Swaminarayan temple to be opened in the UK. The temple comes under the ISSO wing of the Swaminarayan Sampraday[1][2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shri_Swaminarayan_Mandir,_Brighton
 
Is this man the only Sikh in Brighton and Hove?
Sukhdev Ahluwalia has been left wondering if he is the only Sikh in the city.
Friday 23rd August 2013: This man has been left wondering if he is the only Sikh in the city.
Sukhdev Ahluwalia set up a society celebrating the religion shortly after moving to Brighton in 2010.
He put information in local libraries and notifications on listings websites.
But nearly two years on, he hasn’t had a single response.
The 79-year-old said: “I thought in such a big city there would be an active Sikh community. It’s a shame really, it would be nice to meet up with fellow Sikhs.”
…
As part of the 2011 census, 342 people stated their religion as Sikhism in Brighton and Hove.
https://www.sikhnet.com/news/man-only-sikh-brighton-and-hove
 
BODHISATTVA KADAMPA MEDITATION CENTRE
 
https://brightonbuddhistcentre.co.uk/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_places_of_worship_in_Brighton_and_Hove

Includes some of the above
Coptic Orthodox, Greek Orthodox, Latin-rite, you name it, Brighton has it.

The pagans seem beset by health issues, but you can always climb Whitehawk Hill or go to Chanctonbury Ring or the Roman villa at Bignor.  Sussex is so littered with ancient sites, the pagans probably think a moot in a pub is neither here nor there.

With love from Sussex, still one of the most resolutely pagan parts of England.  Tell you what, Boden, have an adventure, go to Chanctonbury Ring in the middle of the night.    https://www.philipcarr-gomm.com/essay/hidden-magic-sussex-way-working-anyplace/  http://www.sussexarch.org.uk/saaf/index.html  Actually, Sussex has a brutish, pagan past. It was the last Saxon county to be converted to Christianity. No one even tried until St Wilfrid in the 680’s, and the new religion remained unpopular in the county for centuries to come (laws to stamp out paganism were still being passed by William the Conqueror). The area’s unsavoury reputation persisted until at least the 16th century. Escaped criminals, highwaymen and general undesirables used the vast forests that covered the Weald as a hide out before Tudor and Stuart militarization unleashed a programme of savage deforestation; the trees were felled to smelt iron and build ships. From the late 18th century, Brighton became a fashionable spa town, thanks to the patronage of the Prince Regent (later George IV). Catholicism in the county was always weak, and non-conformism never as strong as the Church of England. These days Sussex is rich, protestant and respectable. But beneath this polite veneer the old gods still writhe.   https://unbound.com/books/the-sussex-devils/updates/strange-sussex-by-the-sea  But of course:   

PANTHER -> Site news -> 'England is a bad country for gods.' A Guide for Mr Blair  by Ysabel Howard - Sunday, 2 October 2011, 07:05 PM   
First posted 28th March 2007  No, not that kind of a Guide! Welcome, o overseas readers, to Britain, Land of Baden-Powell, Bath Olivers (kind of biscuit), Brighton Rock (kind of candy) and Byron, but alas Blair, and consequently the Civil Contingencies Bill, the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill, the abandoning of habeas corpus and repeated attempts to criminalize the derision of religion.  Some secularists use the term 'sky-fairy' to describe God, but it's not really a very evocative or accurate term. Whether we're talking about the Great Psychotic or the Perfect Dad there's surely nothing fairy-like about him.  "...Besides, what you call them are made-up things the People of the Hills have never heard of - little buzzflies with butterfly wings and gauze petticoats, and shiny stars in their hair, and a wand like a school-teacher’s cane for punishing bad boys and rewarding good ones...Can you wonder the People of the Hills don’t care to be confused with that painty-winged, wand-waving, sugar-and-shake-your-head set of impostors?"  Rudyard Kipling, Puck of Pook’s Hill, 1906  "The fact is they began as Gods...England is a bad country for Gods...They were a stiff-necked, extravagant set of idols, the Old Things...Men don’t like being sacrificed at the best of times; they don’t even like sacrificing their farm-horses. After a while men simply left the Old Things alone and the roofs of their temples fell in, and the Old Things had to scuttle out and pick up a living as best they could...I remember one Goddess called Belisama. She became a common wet water-spirit somewhere in Lancashire.".  Ibid.  

Ah, an ancestor of mine, perhaps. Religions more ancient than the monotheisms were more relaxed about the human-god divide. Emperors could be or become gods. 
It's all going to vanish, right?  The complex quilt that is England, ancient and modern, indigenous and recently arrived, where the Dept of Astrophysics is a walk away from a Neolithic site,  it’s all going to be razed to the ground and replaced by a cold, vicious uniformity where nothing is allowed to be acknowledged to exist beyond the raving of psychopathic perverts in black dresses dictating to everyone what we may read, write, think, say, do, be.   It ain’t gonna happen, bubba, it just ain’t gonna happen. In short the word of the Pink Hippo shall be law.
 
The Pink Hippo on women Some other questions about the role of women under Hippoism are answered on the Frequently Asked Questions page. Women as second class beings The Pink Hippo placed women on Earth to be the servants of men, the playthings of men and the bearers of future generations. There is nothing in The Holy Books of Hippoism that can be interpreted as meaning that The Pink Hippo meant women to have equal status to men - so they don't. Women as dangerous lustful beasts and tempters of men Women are by their very nature a temptation to men. It is totally unreasonably to expect men to control their lusts - after all, without lusts we would have no future generations. It therefore follows that while women should always be at the service of men, they should step aside when men are engaged on the more important things in life such as discussing The Pink Hippo. Women should be kept in their place Women should not get ideas above their subordinate station in life. If a woman dares to challenge any man she shall be taken to a place of solitude and there left for 5 days on a diet of mushrooms and water to learn the error of her ways. Women shall have no part in the worship of The Pink Hippo. Their duty is to obey men and no woman shall ever be placed in a position of authority over men. http://www.bitbarn.co.uk/pinkhippo/women.htm 
Why do so many of your rules oppress women? This is a typical Ahippoist misinterpretation of our beliefs. Our rules "protect" women, they do not "oppress" them. Women were created by The Pink Hippo to be the companions and serving maids of men - in this life and in the paradise to come. This was clearly laid done by The Messenger in The Revealed Truth. He himself had many women in all the villages he visited in South Derbyshire and, just before his ascension, was very fond of young girls - his last wife, Alice, was only six years old. Women's role is to provide for men, to bear children and to look after the next generation. Our rules protect women against the natural lusts of men - lusts which it is unreasonable to expect men to control. Are there any women Hippoist "scholars"? No.  
As described above, women need protecting and part of that protection is to keep them within the home - the home of their parents before marriage and the home of their husband after marriage. This means that women do not need education - and are therefore not in a position to interpret the holy books of The Pink Hippo. Why do women have to wear a plastic bag? We move with the times - plastic is cheap. Women should not be out and about - if they are it is vital that they are totally hidden or the merest glimpse of hair or flesh will inflame the lusts of men - lusts which it is unreasonable to expect men to control. Why do you indoctrinate children in faith schools? Children are the property of their parents. Parents have the right to do what they like with their children. Children have no rules and parents want them to have the rules laid down by The Pink Hippo. We find that the continuous chanting of The Book of the Pink Hippo and The Revealed Truth in a form of medieval English that the children cannot understand, is the best way to indoctrinate children with the ideas of Hippoism. We allocate about two thirds of school time to this - the remainder is given over to reading, writing, arithmetic, PE and weapons training. As Hippoists we must be prepared to defend ourselves at all times. But surely you make children aware of other religions? Of course - we are not blind to the world around us! Other religions are evil and their gods are false - it is very important that we teach our children this. Do you want your children to think for themselves? Certainly not! The Pink Hippo has determined how we should lead our lives and how we should fight the evils around us. Children must not think as they get older, they must obey. http://www.bitbarn.co.uk/pinkhippo/faq.htm 
Aw, don’t you want to talk about the Pink Hippo.  A woman’s place is on her back.  A woman is simply a cunt supine with her legs apart, either being inseminated or popping out the sprogs. Breeding machines, brood mares, that’s all woman are, isn’t it?  Oh, they cover it up in a load of sentimental ape-drool but  it’s repulsive to the dirty old freaks that a woman be intelligent, educated, rational, capable of independent thought. A woman’s business is to breed, not threaten the power of mentally sick brutish subhuman men. 
 A woman has no rights over her body, of course.  Not if there’s a lickle sperm that wants to have its way with her.  Isn’t it terrible, though, how all the other little sperms perish?  I mean these are {{{{SACRED MALE SEED}}}/ 
I think I probably said something about the oestrus cycle at some point, can’t remember what exactly but I expect it upset them.  Weighing the pros and cons of having lost it.  Should the female mammal not at any time be receptive, enthusiastic even? Or of course indeed at any time, should the right adorable male hove into view?  Evil is it for a woman to enjoy or want sex?  Should every act of sexual intercourse even within marriage essentially be rape?  At any rate Elaine Morgan’s The Descent of Woman should be a set text in all schools. Together with The Female Eunuch. 
But that of course would be upsetting, offensive. 
 Less ‘sensitive’ than the governments of the last 20 years explaining deeming an Englishwoman the property of her masters who decide for her, think it’s up to them whether she may be permitted to walk properly and to run. 
Or perhaps a disgusting ape like Linch can do that, how he comes to be imbued with the authority to decide whether I may walk. 
What right a foetid animal like Goldstone has to control the rest of my life, by having broken my body.  Come on pervert ape, explain, sick monkey, filthy dirty little animal.  that smirking monster Naylor, come on your filthy old ape, what right do you have to control my body. 
 
Alcibiades. Please, Pericles, can you teach me what a law is? 
Pericles. To be sure I can. 
Alcibiades. I should be so much obliged if you would do so. One so often hears the epithet "law-abiding" applied in a complimentary sense; yet, it strikes me, one hardly deserves the compliment, if one does not know what a law is. 
Pericles. Fortunately there is a ready answer to your difficulty. You wish to know what a law is? Well, those are laws which the majority, being met together in conclave, approve and enact as to what it is right to do, and what it is right to abstain from doing. 
Alcibiades. Enact on the hypothesis that it is right to do what is good? or to do what is bad? 
Pericles. What is good, to be sure, young sir, not what is bad. 
Alcibiades. Supposing it is not the majority, but, as in the case of an oligarchy, the minority, who meet and enact the rules of conduct, what are these? 
Pericles. Whatever the ruling power of the state after deliberation enacts as our duty to do, goes by the name of laws. 
Alcibiades. Then if a tyrant, holding the chief power in the state, enacts rules of conduct for the citizens, are these enactments law? 
Pericles. Yes, anything which a tyrant as head of the state enacts, also goes by the name of law. 
Alcibiades. But, Pericles, violence and lawlessness--how do we define them? Is it not when a stronger man forces a weaker to do what seems right to him--not by persuasion but by compulsion? 
Pericles. I should say so. 
Alcibiades. It would seem to follow that if a tyrant, without persuading the citizens, drives them by enactment to do certain things--that is lawlessness? 
Pericles. You are right; and I retract the statement that measures passed by a tyrant without persuasion of the citizens are law. 
Alcibiades. And what of measures passed by a minority, not by persuasion of the majority, but in the exercise of its power only? Are we, or are we not, to apply the term violence to these? 
Pericles. I think that anything which any one forces another to do without persuasion, whether by enactment or not, is violence rather than law. 
Alcibiades. It would seem that everything which the majority, in the exercise of its power over the possessors of wealth, and without persuading them, chooses to enact, is of the nature of violence rather than of law? 
To be sure (answered Pericles), adding: At your age we were clever hands at such quibbles ourselves. It was just such subtleties which we used to practise our wits upon; as you do now, if I mistake not. 
Xenophon, The Memorabilia (trad. HG Dakyns) 
 
Of course everyone knows a classical education is irrelevant to the modern world (although with Johnson as the most obvious example to hand, that’s not very surprising).
 
ABOVE THE LAW? 
 
Great goodness, no, they are the law. They decree. The purpose of the law is to be the instrument of their will.  It is unthinkable to them they be subject to the law.  The law to them in short is exactly what Marx and Engels said it was, an instrument of oppression.   The law to the sick animal exists solely to silence dissent and keep the rebellious serfs in order, enable him or her to continue being a disgusting criminal in peace. 
 
Law, morality, religion, are to him so many bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests.  
Marx and Engels:  The Manifesto of the Communist Party 
 
(Should I put that in terms  even anyone as stupid as a politician of the Left can understand?  A lad or lass who has caused trouble at’ mill is prosecuted with lots of big important-sounding words, the full majesty of the law, sedition, but that against which he or she has protested is ignored, let alone criticized, corrected or of course criminal charges brought against it.) 
 
This, what is the term, I’m honestly not sure but think it might be status quo ante, is what the beyond hilarious fascist fake Left falls over itself to demand. 
 
Any ludicrous ramblings about a free and democratic society and equality before the law are dismissed as excuses for disobedience. Because they are raving fucking mad. It is inconceivable to them they be prosecuted: they have simply done what is right and just and necessary and best. 
 
Best for whom?  Blair’s bank balance?  Their private patients from Saudi and the Gulf?  The future of British women?  
 
Abuses by King John caused a revolt by nobles who compelled him to execute this recognition of rights for both noblemen and ordinary Englishmen. It established the principle that no one, including the king or a lawmaker, is above the law. 
http://www.constitution.org/eng/magnacar.htm 
Is some part of that unclear? 
39. No freemen shall be taken or imprisoned or disseised or exiled or in any way destroyed, nor will we go upon him nor send upon him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land. 
40. To no one will we sell, to no one will we refuse or delay, right or justice. 
How about that? 
 
63. Wherefore we will and firmly order that the English Church be free, and that the men in our kingdom have and hold all the aforesaid liberties, rights, and concessions, well and peaceably, freely and quietly, fully and wholly, for themselves and their heirs, of us and our heirs, in all respects and in all places forever, as is aforesaid. An oath, moreover, has been taken, as well on our part as on the art of the barons, that all these conditions aforesaid shall be kept in good faith and without evil intent. 
http://www.constitution.org/eng/magnacar.htm 
Magna Carta, 1215 
 
Hmm, this has possibilities.  Have I been disseiseed?  In the broader sense.  Have I been in some way destroyed?  My mobility has been.  Has right or justice been refused me?  Defo. 
 
How about I sue the Blair Government under Magna Carta?  
 
BLACKSTONE’S COMMENTARIES PRIVATE WRONGS. BOOK III. 
CHAPTER THE EIGHTH. OF WRONGS, AND THEIR REMEDIES, RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS. 
1765-1769 
He's  a bloody lawyer.  Don't tell me he doesn't know that. 
 
They’re going to sue me, you understand.  Sue me for not grovelling to corruption, criminality, bestiality
Ah, so a grotesque monstrous obscene traitor criminal who is probably the bumptious smirking brute Boden is going to sue me if anyone helps me?  The word for that is blackmail; if it is not left free to attempt to destroy me one way, it will attempt to do so in another.

But what does it think it's going to sue me for?   I mean, what have I done apart from identify evident criminals?  How farcically absurd is the dirty old bitch?  Does it stick out its pigeon chest and claim it will sue me for saying one of its precious chicks is illiterate?  As previous:

So come on, sue me for Plato, sue me for Homer, sue for Sophocles, sue me for Euripides, sue me for Xenophanes, Xenophon, Thucydides, Ovid, sue me for Marx, especially, sue me for Lenin, sue me for Engels, sue me for Dante, Petrarch, Boccaccio, sue me for Paine, Voltaire, Diderot, Montesquieu, Racine, Corneille, Baudelaire, Zola, Balzac, Sartre, Camus, Giradoux, Prevert, sue me for Rumi, Hafiz, ibn Arabi, Khayyam, sue me for Buddha, for Lao-Tze, for the Vedas, sue me for Byron, Shelley, Shakespeare, Chaucer, Auden, Wilde, Sitwell, Spender, Eliot,  Sue me for Tolstoy, for Tolkien, for Stephen Donaldson, Julian May, TH White,  Salman Rushdie, Nicholas Montsarrat, Rumer Goden, Len Deighton, JK Rowling, and thousands of others, sue me especially for Schrodinger, Einstein. Tell you what,  ape, sue me for having the temerity to point out we live in a quantum universe or universes not the universe as depicted by your monkey-shit religion. Sue me for pointing out e = mc2. Sue me for having studied English, French, German, Italian and Latin grammar, come on you dirty illiterate ignorant animal, you know you ain’t having that. Sue me for not being a sly, sordid, dirty, cowardly liar, a squalid cockroach that creeps around behind closed doors.  You certainly ain’t having that.
Sue me for having read a thousand books you’ve never heard of, and starting from somewhere different to your  lame empty narrow stupid irrational brain.  That ain’t allowed, is it, cos you got Troof. Sue me for being educated when you are ignorant and ineducable, which is what your hysteria amounts to.  Sue me for being intelligent, which is what your hysteria amounts to.   Of course no educated person is going to think what the ignorant think.  Labour has a solution!  Exterminate the educated.  This of course was basically the solution of both Hitler and Stalin. The reality of the society I which they dwell and in which people possess hundreds of different ideas, many directly opposed to their own, offends them and is a threat.  Labour’s cute solution is that everyone else must cede.
Of Kirit it may be said/He read a book.  It hurt his head/Not liking such a pain/He never read a book again. 
Or any of them. Philistines, savages, barbarians.
1933 is readily recalled as the year Hitler was elected, but it’s also the year Schroedinger got his Nobel prize for physics.
It’s a useful dichotomy.  The ape will win or civilization, knowledge and reason will win. 
It is forbidden to reside in a mental world unacceptable to a sick monkey.  Forbidden, forbidden! Tough fucking shit.  It’s called the C21st.
Do rest assured I am not about to surrender either Jesus or Artemis, Plato or Ibn Arabi, the Upanishads or Einstein, Pan or Schroedinger, Voltaire or Marx, Athena or Rumi, to the ravings of cunt-faced filth, dirty stinking obscene traitors, ape creatures, grovellers, sickos, psychos, totally intellectually and morally corrupt filth-monkeys who abandon all fact, reason, ethics for a smile from their master.   Look at the dirt-monkeys, grovelling, how may we best please you, o master, to the ravings of hairless In sum

Deliberately grossly disabled by your wanton evil,  your insolent treason, your absolute refusal to force democracy on these creatures, to demand they accord with fact, reason and morality, to demand they accord with the norms of civilized behaviour and say it in the open where everyone can hear it and anyone can challenge it, your absolute insolent insistence on the triumph of fascism and corruption and bestiality.  I'm sure you're all very well paid for your sustained effort, your unswerving loyalty to evil.  

As Socrates said... but if any man says that he ever learned or heard anything privately from me, which all the others did not, be assured that he is lying. .
Apology:33bhttp://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0170%3Atext%3DApol.%3Asection%3D33b
 
Cf John 18:20Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world; I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always resort; and in secret have I said nothing
 
Doubtless transparency is supposed to be the bizarre and quaint invention of a silly little woman.As with so many things, this of course is a wonderful index of the total lack of contact these wonders of academe have ever had with any civilized life.
 
Don't suppose they have much time for Plutarch either : For the mind does not require filling like a bottle, but rather, like wood, it only requires kindling to create in it an impulse to think independently and an ardent desire for the truth.

How, after all, can they have trained minds, when they show no signs of having any minds at all?
 
Shit, man, they won't even state their problem in the Agora

I think I shall now dress my hair with vine-leaves.