Impertinent insolent evil filth

Impertinent insolent evil filth.  Dictating to people what they may think,.  Indoctrinating children, terrorizing and damaging children.  Children need to be taught not to lie, not to cheat, not to steal, not to hit, not to bully, not to kill;  to think for themselves; be curious about the world around them; to ask questions; to keep to the law, before which we are all equal and which protects all our rights; and never accept sweets or anything else from strangers.  To be considerate to others and kind to people and animals.  Tidying their bedrooms and doing their homework are also good.   Of course I was taught about Christianity at school, but no-one was ever so vulgar, so crude, so brutish as to demand anyone believed it.  Mr Lygo-Baker, the Headmaster of one of my primary schools  believed it and said that the sun went in at 3 pm on Good Friday to mark Jesus’ death.  He was so sweet.  Absolutely incapable of inflicting himself on anyone, except of course within the necessary realms of headmasterliness.  Freedom of conscience is of course ingrained in all civilized minds.

Who recognize religion is a sand-castle, a house of cards, with no firm foundation, a monstrous structure built on – no, not nothing, a maybe, the whole universe constructed from a single book, not from the millions of different views of its inhabitants, their discoveries, not from finding out about the world; verily a tribute to the human imagination, if often one preying on ignorance and fear and inadequacy, sometimes nothing more than a crude and evil manipulation of the hard-wiring, the desire of the hairless monkey to appease bigger more powerful monkeys and lord it over smaller, more vulnerable ones: the Primate Pecking Order as Divine Law – these are people you crawl to and these are the people you may freely hit, purely an instrument of control with the Great Head Monkey in the Sky on top.

I don’t deny extra-normal events, whether spontaneous remission or time-slips; the universe is a very strange place.  But I don’t think we should live and conduct our affairs as though the strange and not explained were normality – not bother to treat cancer because people have spontaneous remissions.

They got this book, see.  They got Troof, a Troof not only unquestioned but unquestionable.  It is a  grotesque and horrifying mental sickness which knows no doubt and to which the evil are again expecting us to fall.

WE DO NOT KNOW.

Probably on those four words hangs everything.  There is no proof no matter how loudly they scream about Troof and no-one ever should be penalized for dismissing it all as fantasy, garbage. 

The Anglican garden was not of course perfect, nasty poisonous fungi in the corners, infection in the soil, but crude ugly men came with chainsaws and bulldozers, cultivated the fungi, spread the infections, strung banners along the fence reading “War is Peace.  Freedom is Slavery.  Ignorance is Strength.’  Crude, ugly people, who cultivated the fungi, the infection, tried to spread it.  And what did the Anglican Church say but yes, this is better, what silly billies we are not to understand this is true faith.  It is hardly surprising civilized life has taken them at their word.  Indeed all religion is homogenous, homogenously vile, dirty and ugly, for peasants and savages and those with severe psychological problems, particularly concerning sex.  Religions have given the world things of beauty, whether selfless acts saving others,  great art or just routine goodness towards those who fall by the wayside.  Since on this religious leaders are utterly silent it might be assumed by those who know of them that the religious leaders are dismissive of anything beautiful – and by those who don’t that there is nothing beautiful to be dismissive of. 
 
For the first time in many years in England there was just the faintest whiff of the bonfire,  you accept, you obey, you submit, men insolently spouting complete drivel to the public and assuming it would be swallowed whole, because, just because, because it is the utterance of a religious person. For all the slimy things that crawled out of the wainscoting over the ordination of women, I do not think there were any jackboots in the Anglican garden.  If you wanted to be a Christian, we had a church.  The Vatican was and is irrelevant.

Like the Muslims, they completely fail to understand ideas are a free market and they are small fish in a very large pond; were they in a market, people would actually require a reason to visit their stall; even if someone has decided to be a Christian, he or she could become a Methodist or a Baptist or a Seventh Day Adventist, or of course an Anglican.  Of course one of their lunacies is that they are the sole Christian Church but people in  the countries that broke from Rome  don’t see it thus, having perfectly good churches of our own, should we require such a thing; the least Christian of the Christian denominations, possibly.  The Reformation, the English Civil War, the French Revolution, indeed, these things weren’t caused by a fit of pique, Oliver woke up on a bad-hair day, but because people seriously seriously did not like Rome. 

And so, faced with the jackboots, the bonfire and the bulldozers, England simply walked away from Christianity.  They think they address peasants with no other source of information and that we should all lap it up.   On no account ask people what they believe, just tell us what we ought to believe.  Pathetic. 
 
People do not need God to be whole.  People do need love, being as it happens without love sounding brasses and tinkling cymbals.  The Bible states categorically God is love.  At which point the whole thing collapses as if nuked.  You could at a pinch say churches are the house of love, if you were feeling poetic, but the idea of love demanding of you elaborate rituals and invocations is absurd.  You could at a pinch say saying sorry to love is what people do when they realize they’ve done something wrong, but it’s rather than love is causing them to have that realization. 
 
If you have love and the universe, you do not need God.  You may have God anyway.  It is not the concept of God that is a problem, but a fantasy universe populated with fantasy clones and the fascists who attempt to impose on others.
 
There is one perfectly good sense in which humans are puny and insignificant, and that is as a part of the universe, which as we know is like big. We are not required to find a hill-top to stand on to daily tell the universe how small and meaningless we are, what crap we are or others are, how we hope the universe will forgive us for existing, how much we beg it to let us do its will.

There is and has been for as long as humans started to think about these things, an area of human thought in which belief and unbelief meet. The orthodox of course both know about it and strive with all their might to enforce division. That is pantheism, the proposition everything is in essence god, you, me, the fly buzzing against the window, the lilies of the field. 'Are ye not better than they?' Different: ye have the capacity called consciousness to know what ye are.
  
The Church says we are nothing without God, the ultimate reductionism, and indeed many of the faithful are reduced, devoid of love and mind no matter how devout  Millions of atheists indicate that we are love and mind without God – I suppose if you wanted you could say that God is there in you whether you believe in him or not, but that is certainly not what the Church says.  Once you start talking about God within you are merely talking the language of mystics throughout the world but God is supposed to be out there somewhere, utterly separate.  Where exactly?  On the far side of a black hole?  Why not? 
 
Why worry?
 
20And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation: 21Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you. (Luke 17)

As ever intellectual frauds babbling about literal interpretation ignore the bits they don't want you to take the slightest bit literally.
 
Cf Omar Khayyam:
 
“I sent my Soul through the Invisible, 
Some letter of that After-life to spell: 
And by and by my Soul return'd to me, 
And answer'd: 'I Myself am Heav'n and Hell”  

Richard Dawkins thinks someone as intelligent as Jesus would be an atheist today and has written for Atheists for Jesus.  The Catholic Herald of course has a field-day with it, since they ‘know’ Jesus was God.  Others have other views: Jesus as Sufi, Jesus as Brahma, Jesus realizing his Buddha nature.  I have recalled the story of the Sufi Al-Hallaj crucified for proclaiming ‘I am God’.  Or Brahma. That Jesus in some sense was God, should God exist, by no means proves him the only-begotten Son of the Father but only indicates that state known throughout the world in mysticism of being nothing, dissolved in the Whole.  I don’t think he would have been an atheist, but readily identifiable as a mystic.  The Church hates the modern world quite as much as Islam hates it, of course, hates being one of many, hates people in the West deciding that Lao-Tze or Buddha got it right, or at any rate more right than the Vatican.
 
Because of course they have for most of 2000 years survived and thrived on mass ignorance of anything other than their teachings, ignorance of other ways of looking at the world, ignorance of physics, of biology.
 
As late as 1951, 5 million Italians were illiterate (out of a population of 47 million)
 
With of course no television as an alternate source of information.
 
Not a lot of feeding of the sheep going on there, Holy Father.  Other of course than with a very select diet.

Impertinent insolent evil filth that people may not say what they choose about unproven and unprovable rubbish, particularly vicious psychopathic, sexist, racist, homophobic rubbish, a bubble of course assiduously cultivated by religion over the centuries, a huge vile sick bloated suppurating bubble full of monkey-words, heresy, blasphemy, apostasy, insolence, self-will, arrogance, disobedience, but a bubble of intellectual and moral corruption that has bloody well burst, a piece of dribbling evil nonsense to which no-one should have to pay any attention. 

Thus the bubble in full flower to mix my metaphors.  The religion of course different but I doubt any Muslim government today would have a problem with the views of the Popes in the C19th.

Wherefore, civil society must acknowledge God as its Founder and Parent, and must obey and reverence His power and authority. justice  therefore forbids, and reason itself forbids, the State to be godless; or to adopt a line of action which would end in godlessness--namely, to treat the  various religions (as they call them) alike, and to bestow upon them promiscuously equal rights and privileges. Since, then, the profession of one  religion is necessary in the State, that religion must be professed which alone  is true, and which can be recognized without difficulty, especially in Catholic
States, because the marks of truth are, as it were, engraven upon it. This  religion, therefore, the rulers of the State must preserve and protect, if they  would provide--as they should do--with prudence and usefulness for the good of the community. For public authority exists for the welfare of those whom it governs; and, although its proximate end is to lead men to the prosperity found  in this life, yet, in so doing, it ought not to diminish, but rather to increase, man's capability of attaining to the supreme good in which his  everlasting happiness consists: which never can be attained if religion be  disregarded.

22. All this, however, We have explained more fully elsewhere. We now only wish to add the remark that liberty of so false a nature is greatly hurtful to the true liberty of both rulers and their subjects. Religion, of its essence, is wonderfully helpful to the State. For, since it derives the prime origin of all  power directly from God Himself, with grave authority it charges rulers to be  mindful of their duty, to govern without injustice or severity, to rule their people kindly and with almost paternal charity; it admonishes subjects to be  obedient to lawful authority, as to the ministers of God; and it binds them to  their rulers, not merely by obedience, but by reverence and affection,
forbidding all seditions and venturesome enterprises calculated to disturb  public order and tranquillity, and cause greater restrictions to be put upon the  liberty of the people. We need not mention how greatly religion conduces to pure  morals, and pure morals to liberty. Reason shows, and history confirms the fact, that the higher the morality of States, the greater are the liberty and wealth  and power which they enjoy.

 23. We must now consider briefly liberty of speech, and liberty of the press. It is hardly necessary to say that there can be no such right as this, if it be  not used in moderation, and if it pass beyond the bounds and end of all true  liberty. For right is a moral power which--as We have before said and must again  and again repeat--it is absurd to suppose that nature has accorded indifferently  to truth and falsehood, to justice and injustice. Men have a right freely and prudently to propagate throughout the State what things soever are true and honorable, so that as many as possible may possess them; but Iying opinions,  than which no mental plague is greater, and vices which corrupt the heart and  moral life should be diligently repressed by public authority, lest they insidiously work the ruin of the State. The excesses of an unbridled intellect,  which unfailingly end in the oppression of the untutored multitude, are no less rightly controlled by the authority of the law than are the injuries inflicted by violence upon the weak. And this all the more surely, because by far the  greater part of the community is either absolutely unable, or able only with  great difficulty, to escape from illusions and deceitful subtleties, especially  such as flatter the passions. If unbridled license of speech and of writing be  granted to all, nothing will remain sacred and inviolate; even the highest and  truest mandates of natures, justly held to be the common and noblest heritage of  the human race, will not be spared. Thus, truth being gradually obscured by  darkness, pernicious and manifold error, as too often happens, will easily prevail. Thus, too, license will gain what liberty loses; for liberty will ever be more free and secure in proportion as license is kept in fuller restraint. In  regard, however, to all matter of opinion which God leaves to man's free  discussion, full liberty of thought and of speech is naturally within the right  of everyone; for such liberty never leads men to suppress the truth, but often  to discover it and make it known.

 Libertas, Leo XIII, 1888

For you well know, venerable brethren, that at this time men are found not a few who, applying to civil society the impious and absurd  principle of "naturalism," as they call it, dare to teach that "the best  constitution of public society and (also) civil progress altogether require that  human society be conducted and governed without regard being had to religion any  more than if it did not exist; or, at least, without any distinction being made  between the true religion and false ones." And, against the doctrine of  Scripture, of the Church, and of the Holy Fathers, they do not hesitate to
assert that "that is the best condition of civil society, in which no duty is  recognized, as attached to the civil power, of restraining by enacted penalties,  offenders against the Catholic religion, except so far as public peace may require." From which totally false idea of social government they do not fear to  foster that erroneous opinion, most fatal in its effects on the Catholic Church and the salvation of souls, called by Our Predecessor, Gregory XVI, an "insanity,"2 viz., that "liberty of conscience and worship is each man's  personal right, which ought to be legally proclaimed and asserted in every  rightly constituted society; and that a right resides in the citizens to an  absolute liberty, which should be restrained by no authority whether  ecclesiastical or civil, whereby they may be able openly and publicly to  manifest and declare any of their ideas whatever, either by word of mouth, by  the press, or in any other way." But, while they rashly affirm this, they do not  think and consider that they are preaching "liberty of perdition;"3 and that "if  human arguments are always allowed free room for discussion, there will never be  wanting men who will dare to resist truth, and to trust in the flowing speech of  human wisdom; whereas we know, from the very teaching of our Lord Jesus Christ,  how carefully Christian faith and wisdom should avoid this most injurious babbling."4

Quanta Cura, Pius IX 1864

People starving, people dying of treatable disease, and all the rest of the stuff that broadly comes under the term ‘social justice’ is of course omitted from this picture of the perfect moral society.

They do not hide what they are and what they want to this day.

Wounds to unity
817 In fact, "in this one and only Church of God from its very beginnings there arose certain rifts, which the Apostle strongly censures as damnable. But in subsequent centuries much more serious dissensions appeared and large communities became separated from full communion with the Catholic Church - for which, often enough, men of both sides were to blame."269 The ruptures that wound the unity of Christ's Body - here we must distinguish heresy, apostasy, and schism270 - do not occur without human sin:

Where there are sins, there are also divisions, schisms, heresies, and disputes. Where there is virtue, however, there also are harmony and unity, from which arise the one heart and one soul of all believers.271

The Church holds we are helpless without God. We cannot do good without God and so without something entering us from outside. There is no mechanism inside people capable of moral choice. What the rest of us would regard as a natural plurality of perspectives is a wound to unity.

The core of it remains that independent mental activity is considered synonymous with self, to assert the existence of a functioning mind as heart, to have one’s own views not those dictated by another, supposedly speaking on behalf of the God person, to be human, is self-will and rebellion.
"The Magisterium of the Church
85 "The task of giving an authentic interpretation of the Word of God, whether in its written form or in the form of Tradition, has been entrusted to the living teaching office of the Church alone. Its authority in this matter is exercised in the name of Jesus Christ."47 This means that the task of interpretation has been entrusted to the bishops in communion with the successor of Peter, the Bishop of Rome.
86 "Yet this Magisterium is not superior to the Word of God, but is its servant. It teaches only what has been handed on to it. At the divine command and with the help of the Holy Spirit, it listens to this devotedly, guards it with dedication and expounds it faithfully. All that it proposes for belief as being divinely revealed is drawn from this single deposit of faith."48
87 Mindful of Christ's words to his apostles: "He who hears you, hears me",49 the faithful receive with docility the teachings and directives that their pastors give them in different forms.
100 The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church, that is, to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him
Catechism of the Catholic Church
In other words they are the only people who know what it means. It is not exactly surprising to the mostly normal that many disagree.

https://www.space.com/

http://space.mit.edu/

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/space/universe/origins-of-the-universe/

http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/research/gr/public/bb_history.html

http://historyoftheuniverse.com/

Just take your ‘holy books’ and stuff them up your arses, because it’s over.  They have good bits.  They have bad bits.  The notion they are unchallengeable truth is as absurd as it is obscene. 

All the other words from the bubble, holy, sacred, numinous, words they corrupt and make vile, religion is so holy, rabid animals are so holy, psychopaths and misogynists are so holy.

Liberty is a function of love.  Control is a function of self-will. 
 
You are not self-forgetting by definition if you are forcing others to obey you, placing to the fore the seedy clamourings of your self. Similarly 'God's mercy' is an exercise in self-stroking, whether attributed to God or claimed by the religious, a sitting there stroking yourself at how virtuous you are being because you are 'showing mercy'. If you love other people, you don't want to do that from which you are 'mercifully' refraining in the first place. 
Self-forgetting is graciousness, as in beauty of manner. Grace is paramountly not forcing oneself on others other than to restrain them from forcing themselves on others. 
If it’s not demonstrable, it can’t be binding. It is critical to today's intellectual corruption that realities that exist only in people's heads, whether their strange notions of the universe or their convictions of their own probity or intelligence in the face of the evidence, must be treated as sacrosanct, regarded with awe and 'respect;, considered superior to the findings of fact and reason 
If you have love and the universe, you do not need God. You may have God anyway. It is not the concept of God that is a problem, but a fantasy universe populated with fantasy clones and the fascists who attempt to impose on others. 
To love one’s neighbour as oneself is not to force one’s grubby itsy-bitsy self upon him or her. It is not necessary to believe in the Christian or any other revelation to attempt to love one’s fellow beings. 
 
The only sense in which the religious freak regards others as another self is as an extension of himself or herself to be and do and say and think what he or she is and does and says and thinks: property 
 
Some things have been long since bloody settled in England.  That they have not been settled in Rome or Riyadh is irrelevant to me.

The filthy vicious self-obsessed ignorant ineducable cunt-for-brains animals they spawn contribute nothing to either the intellectual or the moral life of the nation are so are irrelevant.

Expecting the taxpayer to fund indoctrinating children, terrorizing and damaging children.  I’m sure it is incredibly difficult and possibly impossible to draw a clear line in law, between Walberton and Binsted Church of England Primary School and the sort of Muslim or Jewish school where children are indoctrinated and damaged, where little girls in particular are subjected to the foulest abuse, hobbled cut off whatever possibility they have, little girls who should be running around in shorts jumping in and out of paddling pools and swarming up climbing frames and dreaming of being Poet Laureate or an eminent physicist, of growing their own vegetables or travelling the world.  Told who they are and what they must be practically as soon as they can speak.

This is actually not because of the nature of the school but because of the nature of the catchment area and the expectations of parents.  It was basically the village primary. Why on earth would you inflict travelling to Barnham or Arundel on your 8-year-old? If parents looked to the Church for anything it was a moral education to turn out decent kids who didn’t lie, cheat, steal etc.  The church itself was just there, always was always will be

Thus I oppose all State funding despite positive experience of church school

And if the last educated person in England will turn the lights out as he or she goes.

Here is a pile of old furniture in the corner someone’s put some curtain fabric over.

Let us make up a little story.  You are a Muslim woman from a liberal/secular family and you get a fit of that good ole time religion.  Let’s not complicate the story with your family/friends worrying about your becoming radicalized, this is pure other world stuff, self-abnegation, the sort of thing that makes people go on pilgrimages.  Your dress becomes more modest, loose trousers, long sleeves, but that thing? 

It is a statement of non-being.  In which you are non-functional.

And from the point of view of anyone with any handicap or disability it is disgusting, you impede your movement, impede your vision; it is an act of self-harm, of hobbling yourself, blinding yourself.  Ironically the only place you are fit for is where it isn’t required; the Christian equivalent would be the contemplative life in an enclosed order of nuns. 

Other things: if people want to spend their lives in prayer and/or meditation, go for it – provided it’s not at the expense of others.  A sip of water, a handful of rice, a quick dip in the river, cool, if that’s your thing, but dependency on a helot class who toil to ensure you are fed, do your laundry, mow the grass, and generally keep you in the manner to which you think you should be accustomed is not cool.

What else is it? A fairly hysterical statement that only the inside matters, but that is not fairly indicated by denoting to the rest of humanity that you are a self-harming freak on a self-abnegation kick, and of course a female one.  Because of course what a burka does is scream your gender.  Dungarees, a lumberjack shirt and combat boots are generally regarded as being pretty good concealers or at any rate annullers of gender.

Which is what all that kind of religion is a filthy damaging castrating crippling of humans, a cutting off from the rest of the world, as though they’re connected to pipes, the empty vessels at the ends of pipes, and all truth, all good comes to them down the pipes and fills them and that is their whole, their existence, nothing else has any reality.

Sealed bubbles round their heads.  Like space-helmets.  Absolutely impervious to fact, reason, the rest of the world.

Born in cages, born slaves, born cattle is probably a better image, livestock in a pen, the size of which of course varies with family, community, country, period in history, but the fences are electrified, completely arbitrary of course, the work of some fucktard’s feverish imagination, but you do not try to cross them, to break out. Taught there is stuff you don’t question, you don’t go near it, you just obey.  Taught to crawl.  Taught to perjure themselves if they disagree, to say what they don’t mean; taught to lie, taught not to question.  Taught to be wholly intellectually and morally corrupt. Taught to dismiss all fact, reason and morality.  Taught independent action of heart and mind is evil and so taught to be intellectually and emotionally helpless, to hang desperately on the tit for all sustenance.  Thus they hit out at sources of offence, having been taught neither self-command (changing what you think and feel) nor self-control (controlling what you think and feel).  Vital, that one, for generating rent-a-mob: see how evil is this freedom that it so upsets incontinent impotent psychopathic hysterics. You are owned and what you are permitted to be is defined by the fences.  If you do not think murdering millions of people and arresting millions more must necessarily lead to the withering away of the state, if you do not think God exists, or that if he, she or it does it matters a hoot to him, her or it whether or not you believe in him, her or it.  It is slightly obvious that it matters exceedingly to the master sheep-shearers, the Fat Controllers, who would lose their power, but why would it matter to God.  Drivel must define your life or if it does not quite possibly end it.

The bubble is impenetrable; they are sealed off from reality.  The absolute evil now ruling England demands that reality not be forced on them, that that not be forced to accord with fact, reason, morality, and that instead everyone else must live in the bubble of puke and lies and venom.  On no account must the vermin of UCH be made to accord themselves with democracy; nothing is too huge to be surrendered. 

Why they’re so desperate to impose themselves, I guess strut around trumpeting their moral superiority, because they know there’s something wrong with them, they’re not properly human.

Religion trumpets endlessly of morality and knows full well what it spawns: sub-humans who think themselves nothing but the slaves of their masters and do evil to order. 

Attracted like wasps to a jam-jar to monkey-mindless subjects like Medicine, where you don’t have to read or think, then the death’s-head deadhead mongol metal mechanical monkeys can think they’re Christ Almighty and oh they do. But getting through Cambridge and never having met anyone who can read and write, that’s quite an achievement.  Don’t suppose they read anything, either. 

THE CLOSED (SEALED/WOUNDED/STUNTED/PRACTICALLY NON-EXISTENT) MIND
Grand-daughter of one of the earliest members of the Labour Party repeatedly brutally abused then left for dead at the express order of fascists and traitors, avatars of criminality, corruption and degradation. You may know them as doctors and nurses.It is reasonably clear that if these people were questioned by any normal educated intelligent person in an open forum where their lunatic notions of Authority, the pathetic and diseased convictions of the psychotic that what they say goes because they say it, so disguising their inability to provide argument or fact supporting the argument and attempting feebly to disguise their rejection of and contempt for others' equal right to speak, they would come over as severely retarded, completely intellectually incapable.But they can't be....
 
So really what the fuck is wrong with them? Certainly fear addles minds.Certainly they are ruled by fear. Certainly fear may be inculcated in them, frightened of getting into trouble, frightened of going to hell. Certainly the fear also contains them internally, they identify themselves with what they believe and if they feel those beliefs threatened they fear they will disintegrate.While the ceiling on thought imposed by a belief-system is of course arbitrary and the ceiling on thought imposed by biology is of course not, each represents a closed system. The Vatican/insert drug of choice/Vatican particularly among the religious but also of course Stalinism and Maoism drools that of course it upholds reason and means by that that the frame of reference, the boundaries of the system, the bricks in the wall are not to be questioned, all that may be 'questioned' are the elements in the box, though in fact this is not so much active questioning as a passive exercise in understanding how those elements fit together, because of course if and when the bricks are questioned the whole thing collapses, and so what is meant by 'reasoning' is understanding how what is given comes to be. Much learning of biology must necessarily be the same, understanding the mechanism by which A becomes B. The thinking is relational. Sounds good. Is it? Possibly even necessarily relational. Ooh, ooh. It is learning to understand how, how absolution works, how the liver functions, how the dictatorship of the proletariat leads to the withering away of the State. That in biology the bricks are real, you cannot challenge what a muscle cell does and adduce argument to demonstrate that actually it performs the functions of a platelet, does not I think affect the general process.With regard to religion, the bricks are of course not there.. Could I have said this before?
 
The Reformation was an expansion of thought beyond the entirely arbitrary limits set by the Vatican, as the Enlightenment and so the present day are expansions of thought beyond the bounds set by Christianity. Minds can go anywhere and where love and reason guide them the result is a vast improvement on anything before. Those in mental cages are going to have to grasp this.Father De Mello was just the sortof sage, slightly mischievous, saintly humble old chapmost people would think of as the best of the Roman Catholic Church. At least the good Father had been dead for nine years before the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (the Inquisition) denounced him as pernicious.
 
De Mello of course stepped outside the cage, Dupuis another victim, the CDF censuring‘ambiguities’, it being the duty of Catholic theologians to uphold not only the teaching of the Church but, essentially, that there is no salvation outside the Church and everyone else is wrong.What is currently in charge in Rome and what finds many ardent supporters throughout the Catholic world is not loveable; the New Internationalist has much to say about Cardinal Ratzinger.
 
The conservative religious male is firstly entirely deluded, about the universe, about the reality of individuals, especially female and gay ones, existing in a mind-construct of the world which, his delusion insists, is as depicted in a single book written in the distant past. Living in his own little world bounded by the dictates of Yahweh-Allah-Jehovah, he thinks he is better than those who donot share his delusion. Why he thinks he is better is because he kids himself he is surrendering ego to the dictates of the Yahweh-Allah-Jehovah as laid down in the book. His beliefs are a comprehensive exercise in stroking his ego, justifying wanton emotional needs, satisfying phobias. The forbidding of ‘blasphemy’ and ‘heresy’ protects him from anything he can’t cope with There are reasons for being kind to the mentally ill but these guys want their sickness deferred to, want the rest of us brain-dead, incapable of criticism, without the right to opinions of our own.In February 2003 theSouth Place Ethical Societydebated whether religion is a mental illness. If mental illness is divorce from reality, the religion of the orthodox is just that. 

Thus for instance we have a psychopath, a murderer, a torturer, a hater of women, a creature ticking all boxes for being a sick cunt, evil, called Khomeini and this sick cunt chose to throw a fit about a book which he said crossed some of the boundaries of the pen, in consequence of which the author should die, a sick cunt clearly a sick joke to whom no-one in the free world would need to pay five seconds’ attention.

In consequence of this it became rapidly apparent that we had an entire population of psychopathic mentally deranged murderous sick cunts in the country, animals who did not belong in the free world, wished only to destroy it, and have us all safely in the cattle-pen.  After that it got funnier: we were supposed to be understanding, be sympathetic, agree how evil was the author to upset them; dribble that they were religious and religion is holy and sacred and no amount of evident psychosis, bestiality can change that.  The Khomeini animal was a great religious leader, a holy man.

The sane response to the Rushdie affair of course was to note that Islam currently has a few problems with sanity and limit Muslim immigration to those who want to live in the free world, for instance Muslims who don’t like the Islam that is currently having a few problems with sanity.

So who decreed murderous animals contemptuous of the free world were a vital adjunct to society?  Had there been a referendum in say 1990 on the subject, but of course it had all been fixed and nobody dreamed of asking us the people. 

Intellectually lazy, intellectually void, total intellectual laziness is bred in them, such that they think their idiot pronouncements are hugely significant. 

Christ the drivel to which England was subjected by Murphy O’Connor trumpeting the party line. 
“I’m on the attack. We have to stand up to them [non-believers]. There is something not totally human if you leave out transcendent [God] and you [atheists] are not fully human. They have an impoverished understanding to what it is to be human. We are all made by God.”
Murphy-O'Connor dribbling on Radio 4.

From the inauguration of Cardinal Nichols:
At the installation of the Most Rev Vincent Nichols at Westminster Cathedral, his predecessor, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, described a lack of faith as “the greatest of evils” and blamed atheism for war and destruction, implying that it was a greater evil even than sin itself.....
 
In his homily he said: “Faith in God is not, as some would portray it today, a narrowing of the human mind or spirit. It is precisely the opposite. “Faith in God is the gift that takes us beyond our limited self, with all its incessant demands . . . Some today propose that faith and reason are crudely opposed, with the fervour of faith replacing good reason. This reduction of both faith and reason inhibits not only our search for truth but also the possibility of real dialogue.”
Cardinal Murphy-O’Connor went farther. Referring to the battles that will be won and lost in the effort to sustain the Christian presence in secular society, he said: “What is most crucial is the prayer that we express every day in the Our Father, when we say ‘deliver us from evil’. The evil we ask to be delivered from is not essentially the evil of sin, though that is clear, but in the mind of Jesus it is more importantly a loss of faith. For Jesus, the inability to believe in God and to live by faith is the greatest of evils.
“You see the things that result from this are an affront to human dignity, destruction of trust between peoples, the rule of egoism and the loss of peace. One can never have true justice, true peace, if God becomes meaningless to people.”
From The Times, 22nd May 2009, now behind a paywall
The evil we ask to be delivered from is not essentially the evil of sin, though that is clear, but in the mind of Jesus it is more importantly a loss of faith. For Jesus, the inability to believe in God and to live by faith is the greatest of evils.
Don’t know where he thinks he got that from and can’t at this moment be bothered to re-read the NT again but hey he speaks for Jesus – possibly just a little presumptuous, as I have observed to the good Catholic Christianity is not what Jesus taught but what the Vatican says it is. Scarcely a novel or bizarre comment: did someone say Reformation?  Basically did you ever hear such ape-shit in your life.  Forget mass-murder, forget rape and torture, a peaceable atheist is guilty of the greatest of all evils. 
You see the things that result from this are an affront to human dignity, destruction of trust between peoples, the rule of egoism and the loss of peace. One can never have true justice, true peace, if God becomes meaningless to people.”

More monkey-puke.  Cf the true justice and true peace that reigns in the Middle East.
Do not bother to give reasons.  How an affront to human dignity?  How trust between peoples destroyed?

The bit that’s pure perv is this
“Faith in God is the gift that takes us beyond our limited self, with all its incessant demands . . .
Faith underpins. legitimizes the filthiest incessant demands of the limited self, holy books enshrine the right of the wibbly wobbly ego to inflict itself on others. Oh how all the zealots and bigots and psychos have bloody faith.  Love takes us beyond our limited selves.  If the writers of the NT knew that, I think a cardinal ought to know it too.
 A modest Christian education recalls 1 Corinthians:
 
1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. 2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. 3And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.
 
13 And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.

I don’t think Jesus would have been so arrantly stupid as to call Dawkins evil – him and 40-50% of the nation. Thought-crimes as ever matter more than real ones.  Yup, we’re all so evil, just spend all our time raping and murdering children. 

Thus of course UCH, the filth world of the freak, joke academics who have decreed that fact and reason must be caged, destroyed and criminals, butchers, traitors, perverts, fascists, sadists must reign unchallenged
Instead also we have the world of the invert, where drivel is to be the untenable but of course no-one is interested in what is tenable boundary of everyone’s lives, for instance the ravings of an illiterate criminal that he isn’t an illiterate criminal.  Anything that screams and drivels, anything that talks out of its arse, is prized and petted should it be offended by anyone saying so.

All supposed to kneel at the feet of drivel-merchants, swallowing whole
inane ravings from any freakoid who has a bit of power.

Mong women.  The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge?  They couldn’t even read the title.  But all are adamant.  These are the intellectual elite of the nation. The cunt-faced evil grotesque Saunders, it’s a NERS.  I’m supposed to be so impressed.  The criminal obscenity who belongs in Broadmoor.  It’s a NERS.  Oh really.  Under which code of conduct do nurses conspire to pervert the course of justice, overthrow democracy, give aid and comfort to the Queen’s enemies, cause grievous bodily harm and smirk, gloat, snigger, titter at their victim for objecting to having been crippled and insisting I live in a democracy, vicious snarling animals, rotten to the core, unreachable by human means. Cattle, rotten to the core, devoid of integrity, principle, self-respect, honour, education, ethics, reason, Master cracked the whip and the vermin fell on their faces.  Human vomit corrupt obscenity, rotting flesh. 

These monster women sniggered and smirked and tittered and gloated when I was exhausted and desperate and my mum was dying and they found it all so fucking funny, these diseased, perverted evil, sickening bags of rotting flesh, human obscenity, so fucking funny that I objected to having been crippled, so fucking funny that I insisted I lived in a democracy.

Cut to Blair and the rest of the New Labour offal responsible for the ‘expansion of the universities’ jabbering I’m sure they’re just as good as you are.  No, they’re not.  For a start they’re human vermin. 

With malice aforethought these subhuman vermin were left free to do what they liked, strut their insolent treason, shit on democracy, break my body and wreck my life.

Nothing can be done.  You have to go along with it.  As the filth well know, the free world is an exercise in not having gone along with it, having done something about it, so why the fuck was arse-aching ape-shit allowed for five seconds to bother me. 

Died because would not grovel to superstition, psychosis, unreason, garbage, bestiality, total intellectual and moral corruption, to bags of rotting flesh, degenerate, degraded, depraved, diseased, totally intellectually and morally corrupt, filthy sickening slaves on leads, vile degraded depraved degenerates who grovel when Master yanks the chain, agents of hostile fascist foreign powers insistent I become a piece of filth like them, a sick dirty squirming animal like them, capering monkeys like them, dirty, smelly animals like them, vermin like them, sordid squalid cowardly twisted evil like them., filthy vile foul bags of corruption and sickness and treason like them, dirty sly squalid sordid cowardly dishonest offal like them.

The viler the religion, the more sexually diseased sub-normal sniggering tittering animal women who think it’s just silly for a woman to claim to be an intellectual, claim to be able to argue with their masters – actually I claim to be able to win the argument with their masters, because their masters, like them, are nothing, rely on lies and authority and talk out of
their arses – the more necessary it is mock it, tear it apart.

It is just so obvious the enemy is reason, the enemy is intelligence, the enemy is fact, the enemy is the reality of C21st society, with all the little pagans and Buddhists and nothings in particular and atheists and secularists and humanists all pottering along getting on with our lives and doing no harm to anyone, that thought, knowledge, reason are the deadly foes of the vermin.  Slavering hatred is directed at freedom, democracy, anything in the way of their wielding unaccountable, unchallengeable and so criminal power, decreeing how everyone and everything must be.