Ain’t no-one disrespecting them
 
Fight breaks out in Tesco egg aisle over two-minute silence for Remembrance Sunday - Mirror Online
 
Thus the incontinent, hysterical violent trash generated by Trot anti-educators teaching their charges they and indeed their nearest and dearest are without flaw and any criticism is disrespect.
 
Especially of course the intimation someone might be lying.  A series of allegations appeared on Instagram, sending the Twitterverse into a feeding frenzy.  It is observed that to question these allegations is ‘disrespectful’.  In this world there is no fact, law, standards or of course that about which one may argue.  It is in short the world of the loon.
 
I think I was about 25 when people started to be frightened of yob mongs, frightened to correct them. 
 
The best of a recent harvest is probably the snippet oft reiterated in articles on how Johnson will get along with a Biden White House.
 
Boris Johnson says he has no regrets about claiming that Barack Obama’s “part-Kenyan” heritage had driven him towards anti-British sentiment.
Last month, while still London mayor, Johnson was accused of dog-whistle racism for the way he criticised Obama’s intervention in the EU debate.
Writing in the Sun about the decision of the Obama administration to remove a bust of Britain’s wartime leader Winston Churchill from the Oval Office, Johnson said: “Some said it was a snub to Britain. Some said it was a symbol of the part-Kenyan president’s ancestral dislike of the British empire – of which Churchill had been such a fervent defender.” In fact, the bust was a loan to President Bush.
Johnson was asked on Wednesday whether he had any regrets about the way he phrased comments. “Of course not,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
He went on to cite an opinion piece in the Guardian. “I was merely quoting a point that I think was also made in the Guardian newspaper and nobody accuses the Guardian [of being racist],” Johnson said. A post in April on the rightwing Guido Fawkes blog made the same point. It quoted a Guardian article that asked whether Obama’s dual heritage could reshape Britain’s special relationship with the US. The Guido Fawkes post said: “Nobody accused the Guardian of dog-whistling. Yet the Remainers threw their toys out of the pram.”
After Johnson congratulated Biden, Tommy Vietor, a former Obama press aide and now a leading figure on the influential Pod Save America franchise, referred to the prime minister’s previous comments about Barack Obama’s “part-Kenyan” heritage. “This shapeshifting creep weighs in,” he tweeted. “We will never forget your racist comments about Obama and slavish devotion to Trump.”
Biden win plus no-deal Brexit could leave Johnson in a 'lonely place in the world' | Politics | The Guardian
 
It appears actually to have been The Times:
 
The Times of London, relying on statements by Obama's third wife, Sarah Onyango Obama, 87, reported that in 1949, after becoming more politically active, Obama was jailed by the British for two years for suspicion of supplying military information to the Kenyan independence movement, owing to "His job as a cook to a British army officer."[14][15] According to Sarah, Obama was subjected to beatings and abuse that left him with physical scars and a loathing of the British.[14] David Maraniss' 2012 biography of President Barack Obama states that his grandfather Obama did not participate in the insurrections; nor was he ever imprisoned by the British during the uprising. He continued to be trusted by white Kenyans.[16][17]
 
Barack Obama Sr. - Wikipedia
 
As a young man, Onyango Obama traveled widely, enlisting in the British colonial forces and visiting Europe, India, and Zanzibar. There, he converted from Roman Catholicism to Islam and took the name Hussein. He became a cook for missionaries and a local herbalist in Nairobi.
 
Ibid.
 
He was born in 1936.  I do not know how young you could be to ‘enlist in the British colonial forces’ and subsequently gain a job as a cook but in 1949 he would have been 13.
 
This was a bright guy who became a member of the Kenyan government.  Whatever menial tasks he did or did not perform in his teens:

College and graduate school
In 1959, the Kenyan Department of Education published Obama's monograph, entitled Otieno jarieko. Kitabu mar ariyo. 2: Yore mabeyo mag puro puothe. (English: Otieno, the wise man. Book 2: Wise ways of farming.)[26][27]
Due to his accomplishments, in 1959 Obama received a scholarship in economics through a program organized by the nationalist leader Tom Mboya. The program offered education in the West to outstanding Kenyan students.[28][29] Initial financial supporters of the program included Harry Belafonte, Sidney Poitier, Jackie Robinson, and Elizabeth Mooney Kirk, a literacy advocate who provided most of the financial support for Obama's early years in the United States.[30] Kirk and her literacy associate Helen M. Roberts of Palo Alto raised the money necessary for Obama to travel to the US.[31][32]
 
Kenya became independent in 1963, so the colonial government did not hold back his education.
 
If your dad had been humiliated and tortured by the British or the Ukrainians or the Irish or the Malaysians or the Saudis or the Dutch or anyone else on the planet is it likely you would feel warmly towards them and what they represented.  I’m sure McDonnell can tell  us about ancestral hates.  Did we not read how poor Connolly was shot in the chair/All his wounds from the battle all bleeding and bare.
 
We have now reached nutter world where any allusion to anyone’s nationality is suspect. 
 
I have absolutely no idea of the rules governing nationality either here or in Kenya following independence, but I see that Barack Obama Jr, 44th President of the United States, was the son of a (former?) British subject and a certain amount of fun could be had trying to prove he is British.
 
Of course it should not be thought it is limited to those without education or position.

The US politics sketch
Donald Trump
Trump may have broken his own record for most dangerous lies in one speech
In 16 minutes, the liar-in-chief offered a downright dishonest take on the election that risked inciting violence
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/05/trump-record-lies-us-election
 
And they taught, the Left, you don’t have to tell the truth, indeed you display emotional intelligence is you lie, you don’t have to adhere to reason and what they got was Trump.
 
If I were a detached observer, Ford Prefect, say, I should piss with helpless laughter.
 
Try again.  Lies split people between what is and what they believe to be.  Lies create a false delusional and dangerous reality.  No, that is not a live wire.  That pile of paper over there consists of 123 votes not 43 or 1506.
 
Argument by authority is a fallacy.  Something is true because it refers to something extant outside the head of the speaker, not because of who the speaker is.
 
Yawn, yeah, that too.  The point of course is no point.
 
The words for those who will not even discuss reality, dismiss it out of hand, are raving nutters. 
 
Nutters ain’t ‘aving no bleedin’ facts, right.  They ain’t fucking ‘aving it.  Eyes bulge.  Froth at mouth.
 
The word for those who know perfectly well what the facts are and reject them to uphold the world of the raving nutter is evil.
 
And all the little chimpo-whores, the slave-slags, just spread their legs.All their dirty little monkey brains understand is that bigger more powerful monkeys will hurt them if displeased.  Appease big monkey, please big monkey.  Obey big monkey.
 
That is of course what all fascist death-cults of obedience do, spawn chimpo-whores
 
 
So if I just stop being a little silly and cease to be me, become a slave-slut dead from the neck up, an ignorant and vicious mong, then they’re all happy.
 
Just deny intellectual and political history, just deny the country I grew up in, the society around me, just deny everything I have read and thought contrary to the ravings of the criminally insane Broadmoor case, just of course deny all the evidence of what has happened to me
 
The God of these filthy creatures is not Love.  It is Self.  Self-will, self-aggrandizement, self-protection, self-advancement. 
 
All that is of significance to them is the ravings between their ears to which all others must submit.  You, me, the guy who just cycled past my window, we have no reality, no individuality, no significance to them.
 
Truth, fact, reason, justice, fairness, freedom, democracy, none of these things matter to the chimpo-whore, the slave-slag, trash, garbage, vermin.  None of these things matter to them because in order for them to matter it needs to matter what happens to other people, and that doesn’t matter to a dirty animal, a bag of shit, contemptible filth, the dregs of humanity, the scum of the bloody earth, animals to whom violence is normal, bestiality is normal.
In their degraded, depraved obscene slave-slag world,  you offend someone with power and  you get crippled and destroyed and all that matters to the filthy little slags is power and pleasing power.
 
They don’t even understand there’s anything wrong with them, these morally and intellectually derelict, evil subhuman vermin, traitor vermin, sick pervert monkeys, dirty, smelly animals, and that’s just the doctors. Absolute filth, trash.  Who gives a fuck about such creatures?  Ain’t you just gotta ‘ave respect for the scum of the earth.
 
There are six things needed to do a physics degree
Brain
Time
Money
Energy
Mobility
A Levels
 
Alas, I only have the first and not excessive amounts of time.  Running on roughly a 12-hour day here, After 12 hours of wakefulness, eyelids droop.
 
Went to the vampire den,  I mean my GP’s, for yet more blood-tests.  A lot of things irritate me.  You noticed?  One of them is beforehand I regarded the expedition as – perhaps an ordeal is too strong a word, but a stressor, after which breathe sigh of relief because I don’t have to go anywhere. 
 
At the moment.  It appears I require a CT.  Laters, laters.  It has to be reiterated getting to and from the bloody scanner is potentially far more of a pain than the scan itself.  I shall investigate. 
 
If I can just regain my pre-PMR or whatever the fuck it is levels of functionality, that will be good.
 
Meanwhile it’s a beautiful autumn morning and there are tiny but critical acts of good in the world.  I was still in bed when Amazon arrived and my movement is yeutch on rising so I called out of the window to ask the guy to leave it on the doorstep when I’d eventually get to it, but he passed it through the window to me.
 
A brain of course is a useful asset in any aspect of life.  Most of these creatures don’t have one and of course hate and fear anyone who does, anyone who has movement between the ears.
 
We’re not supposed to have anything between the ears.  When some malignant subnormal  fucktard opines, what we are not supposed to say is well, OK, that’s how you see it, but other people see it differently.
 
Thus the nauseating evil old freak opines religion is not mocked and clearly expects no comeback to this filthy evil lying fascist animal filth.
 
…it’s because of thinking that Sweden, Denmark, the whole of your island, half of Germany groan under the terrible misery of no longer being subjects of the pope.
[…….c’est pour avoir pensé, que la Suède, le Danemark, toute votre île, la moitié de l’Allemagne, gémissent dans le malheur épouvantable de n’être plus sujets du pape]
LIBERTÉ DE PENSER
 
Intelligence brought them down, reason brought them down, thought brought them down.  This must not be allowed to happen again. 
 
None of them will shut up until all criticism and derision of their mad monkey-puke is forbidden and we’re all crawling to their ravings.  What, even the indefensible bits? 
 
Especially the indefensible bits.  Look what happened to Johnson after his ‘shocking’ comments about the burqua.  What is shocking is that anyone should think a fellow human being be forced into such a garment.
 
Mustn’t draw Mohammed.  Muslims forbid it.  Mustn’t mock the burqua.  Muslims forbid it. 
So fucking what?
 
Must be sensitive.  Must be really sensitive about the genuine and sincere beliefs of the sexually diseased.
 
Could we be being insensitive to women forced into the bloody thing and otherwise physically constrained in what the rest of regard as their normal lawful movement, any chance of exit clearly closed?  What does that matter? 
 
Do the dirty evil deformed old apes understand we don’t want to know about their shit?  Of course they do.  They’re creatures who belong in zoos who think that doesn’t matter.  They know best.  They know what’s for our own good and being left free is clearly bad for us.  They got Troof. 
 
People do not give a fuck, apart from the bits they find actively repulsive and evil, about which most certainly we are to be silenced. 
 
Of course what people think does not matter.  All the chimpo-whores in politics see to that.
 
And of course the garbage know what’s best for me.  Best for me to be crippled.  Best for me to be ignored.  What do the kinky-boy freaks and their kinky-bitch women whine, I have to learn to do what I’m told.  I must learn obedience.  And you can stuff it all up your smelly arses.
 
The simplest facts of history dismissed out of hand by  mental defectives and the evil who manipulate them telling them lies are truth and truth is lies.
 
A past golden age in which the whole of England was both devout and observant is itself a myth:
 
The Religious Census of 1851 demonstrated what Christians had long feared, that a large proportion of the population of England were neither Church people nor of any other religion. Although the exact figures must be treated with great caution, it seems clear that at least one-half of the people who might have been expected to go to church or chapel in 1851 did not do so. Most of the non-attenders came from the working classes...'the population having been till recently all but destitute of church ordinances, has relapsed into a state of semi-heathenism', wrote a vicar in a new parish near Oldham.
....
Queen Victoria...cared little for 'extreme views' in religion, and in teaching her children...chose to dwell not on 'the supernatural features of the Christian religion, but rather upon the pure and comprehensive morality which it teaches us as its essential and indestructible element;
Dickens's morality owed nothing to Evangelicalism or Tractarianism. Much religion, he suggested, was a 'vent for bad humours and arrogance' and there was no authority for the Murdstones in the New Testament; David Copperfield's opinion that 'we can all do some good if we will' was far more appealing. Dickens's obituary notes in Fraser's Magazine (July 1870) rightly seized on the point that 'he spent no thought on religious doctrines or religious reforms but regarded the Sermon on the Mount as good teaching, had a regard for the village church and churchyard, and quarrelled with nothing but intolerance'
Asa Briggs: The Age of Improvement
 
The original report of the 1851 Census reads as follows:
The most important fact which this investigation as to attendance brings Most important before us is, unquestionably, the alarming number of the non-attendants. Even fnquirj as to in the least unfavorable aspect of the figures just presented, and assuming (as attendance, no doubt is right) that the 5,288,294 absent every Sunday are not always the same individuals, it must be apparent that a sadly formidable portion of the English people are habitual neglecters of the public ordinances of religion. Nor is it difficult to indicate to what particular class of the community this portion in the main belongs. The middle classes have augmented rather than diminished that devotional sentiment and strictness of attention to religious services by which, for several centuries, they have so eminently been distinguished. With the upper classes, too, the subject of religion has obtained of late a marked degree of notice, and a regular church-attendance is now ranked amongst the recognized proprieties of life. It is to satisfy the wants of these two classes that the num ber of religious structures has of late years so increased. But while the labouring myriads of our country have been multiplying with our multiplied material prosperity, it cannot, it is feared, be stated that a corresponding increase has occurred in the attendance of this class in our religious edifices. More espe- cially in cities and large towns it is observable how absolutely insignificant a portion of the congregations is composed of artizans. They fill, perhaps, in youth, our National, British, and Sunday Schools, and there receive the elements of a religious education ; but, no sooner do they mingle in the active world of labour than, subjected to the constant action of opposing influences, they soon become as utter strangers to religious ordinances as the people of a heathen country. From whatever cause, in them or in the manner of their treatment by religious bodies, it is sadly certain that this vast, intelligent, and growingly important section of our countrymen is thoroughly estranged from our religious institutions in their present aspect. Probably, indeed, the pre valence of infidelity has been exaggerated, if the word be taken in its popular meaning, as implying some degree of intellectual effort and decision ; but, no doubt, a great extent of negative, inert indifference prevails, the practical effects of which are much the same. There is a sect, originated recently, adherents to a system called " Secularism " ; the principal tenet being that, as the fact of a future life is (in their view) at all events susceptible of some degree of doubt, while the fact and the necessities of a present life are matters of direct sensation, it is therefore prudent to attend exclusively to the concerns of that existence which is certain and immediate — not wasting energies required for present duties by a preparation for remote, and merely possible, contingencies. This is the creed which probably with most exactness indicates the faith which, virtually though not professedly, is entertained by the masses of our working population ; by the skilled and unskilled labourer alike — by hosts of minor shopkeepers and Sunday traders — and by miserable denizens of courts and crowded alleys. They are unconscious Secularists — engrossed by the demands, the trials, or the plea sures of the passing hour, and ignorant or careless of a future. These are never or but seldom seen in our religious congregations ; and the melancholy fact is thus impressed upon our notice that the classes Which are most in need of the restraints and consolations of religion are the classes which are most without them.
Census of Great Britain, 1851
 
If this is what New Labour hoped to rectify, they were about 150 years too late.

Tom Paine in The Age of Reason (1794) described Jesus as ‘a virtuous and amiable man’ who preached ‘most excellent morality…It is upon this plain narrative of facts…that the Christian mythologists, calling themselves the Christian church, have erected their fable, which for absurdity and extravagance is not to be exceeded by anything that is to be found in the mythology of the ancients.’

Many people of all faiths and none have engaged with the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth. In the words of Jesus Christ Superstar, ’he’s a man, he’s just a man’, and engagement with him does not mean that we have the slightest interest in the notion that God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son to it.
 
..
Paine also wrote: 'My own mind is my own church.'

I believe in one God, and no more; and I hope for happiness beyond this life.

I believe in the equality of man; and I believe that religious duties consist in doing justice, loving mercy, and endeavoring to make our fellow-creatures happy.

But, lest it should be supposed that I believe in many other things in addition to these, I shall, in the progress of this work, declare the things I do not believe, and my reasons for not believing them.

I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church.

British citizens have gone in the direction of Tom Paine. British politicians are headed off in the opposite direction, courting figures from religious establishments who by definition adhere to a dead orthodoxy, about which no-one besides fellow-dinosaurs gives a damn.
 
 
Most pernicious Be careful what you wish for... New Page more... A SHORT HISTORY LESSON Magna Carta: 1215

The Pope denounced Magna Carta as the work of the  devil, you know. Others think it a cornerstone of Anglo-American  democracy. Britannia  ecclesiam romanam non amat neque amabat.

Welcome,  therefore to England, land of Henry VIII, Elizabeth I, Charles I,  Cromwell,  William of Orange, the Glorious Revolution, Paine, Darwin, Marx. Of course in  turdville they know no  history. Faith schools not all they're cracked up to be then?

1534: Act  of Supremacy established the Church of England, of which the monarch is the head.

Once upon a time there was  a king called Charles. He had a Catholic wife,  upheld the rejected concept of  the divine right of kings and cosied up  to Rome. His head ended up separated  from his body, rolling gently away  from him down Whitehall.

English Civil War 1642-1651

30 January 1649 Execution of Charles I

Shortly  after, there was another king called James and his reign ended with the Glorious Revolution and the installation of the resolutely Protestant  William of Orange  and the law-makers rather thought they'd settled  things once and for all.

1688 Glorious Revolution and establishment of Protestant  succession
 
It can be argued that James's  overthrow began modern English parliamentary democracy: never since has  the monarch held  absolute power, and the Bill of Rights has become one  of the most important documents in the political history of Britain. The deposition of the Roman  Catholic James II ended any chance of  Catholicism becoming re-established in  England, and led to limited  toleration for nonconformist Protestants — it would be some time before  they had full political rights. For Catholics, however, it  was  disastrous both socially and politically. Catholics were denied the  right  to vote and sit in the Westminster Parliament for over 100 years  afterwards. They were also denied commissions in the army and the  monarch was forbidden to  be Catholic or marry a Catholic, thus ensuring a Protestant  succession. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glorious_Revolution

 And I do declare that no foreign  prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any  jurisdiction,
power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority,  ecclesiastical or spiritual,  within this realm. 

And whereas it hath been found by  experience  that it is inconsistent with the safety and welfare of this  Protestant kingdom  to be governed by a popish prince, or by any king or  queen marrying a papist, the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and  Commons do further pray that it may  be enacted, that all and every  person and persons that is, are or shall be  reconciled to or shall hold  communion with the see or Church of Rome, or shall profess the popish  religion, or shall marry a papist, shall be excluded and be  for ever  incapable to inherit, possess or enjoy the crown and government of  this  realm and Ireland and the dominions thereunto belonging or any part of   the same, or to have, use or exercise any regal power, authority or   jurisdiction within the same; 
English Bill of Rights, 1689

The office of Prime Minister had yet to be created.  Academic lawyers could argue for years about whether it was within the  spirit of the law  that it is inconsistent with the safety and welfare of this Protestant kingdom  to have the Prime Minister married to a  Catholic. 

Indeed they were bloody lawyers.  They knew what they were messing with. 

And then roughly 100 years later there was a little  upset in France and another king found his head rolling gently away from his body and  lots of blood coming from his neck and there was the  Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Civil Constitution of the  Clergy and they just don't seem to  learn, cos they got Troof.

French Revolution  1789-1799

12 July 1790 Civil Constitution of the Clergy making all Roman Catholic priests subordinate to the French government
21 January 1793  Execution of Louis XVI
17 November 1793 celebration of the goddess 'Reason' in Notre-Dame de Paris

 4 July 1776 Declaration of Independence of these United States of America
 
The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America was adopted in December 1791. 

Congress shall make no law respecting  an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;  or
abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a  redress of  grievances.
 
Probably the Vatican didn't even notice, being somewhat more locally engaged. Others, however, did and do.
 
They didn't surrender to the voice of sweet reason. They were forced to surrender and indeed fought a valiant rearguard action.

Wherefore, civil society must acknowledge God as its Founder and Parent, and must obey and reverence His power and authority. justice  therefore forbids, and reason itself forbids, the State to be godless; or to adopt a line of action which would end in godlessness--namely, to treat the  various religions (as they call them) alike, and to bestow upon them
promiscuously equal rights and privileges. Since, then, the profession of one  religion is necessary in the State, that religion must be professed which alone  is true, and which can be recognized without difficulty, especially in Catholic
States, because the marks of truth are, as it were, engraven upon it. This  religion, therefore, the rulers of the State must preserve and protect, if they  would provide--as they should do--with prudence and usefulness for the good of
the community. For public authority exists for the welfare of those whom it governs; and, although its proximate end is to lead men to the prosperity found  in this life, yet, in so doing, it ought not to diminish, but rather to increase, man's capability of attaining to the supreme good in which his  everlasting happiness consists: which never can be attained if religion be  disregarded.

22. All this, however, We have explained more fully elsewhere. We now only wish to add the remark that liberty of so false a nature is greatly hurtful to the true liberty of both rulers and their subjects. Religion, of its essence, is wonderfully helpful to the State. For, since it derives the prime origin of all  power directly from God Himself, with grave authority it charges rulers to be  mindful of their duty, to govern without injustice or severity, to rule their
people kindly and with almost paternal charity; it admonishes subjects to be  obedient to lawful authority, as to the ministers of God; and it binds them to  their rulers, not merely by obedience, but by reverence and affection,
forbidding all seditions and venturesome enterprises calculated to disturb  public order and tranquillity, and cause greater restrictions to be put upon the  liberty of the people. We need not mention how greatly religion conduces to pure  morals, and pure morals to liberty. Reason shows, and history confirms the fact, that the higher the morality of States, the greater are the liberty and wealth  and power which they enjoy.

 23. We must now consider briefly liberty of speech, and liberty of the press. It is hardly necessary to say that there can be no such right as this, if it be  not used in moderation, and if it pass beyond the bounds and end of all true  liberty. For right is a moral power which--as We have before said and must again  and again repeat--it is absurd to suppose that nature has accorded indifferently  to truth and falsehood, to justice and injustice. Men have a right freely and prudently to propagate throughout the State what things soever are true and honorable, so that as many as possible may possess them; but Iying opinions,  than which no mental plague is greater, and vices which corrupt the heart and  moral life should be diligently repressed by public authority, lest they insidiously work the ruin of the State. The excesses of an unbridled intellect,  which unfailingly end in the oppression of the untutored multitude, are no less
rightly controlled by the authority of the law than are the injuries inflicted by violence upon the weak. And this all the more surely, because by far the  greater part of the community is either absolutely unable, or able only with  great difficulty, to escape from illusions and deceitful subtleties, especially  such as flatter the passions. If unbridled license of speech and of writing be  granted to all, nothing will remain sacred and inviolate; even the highest and  truest mandates of natures, justly held to be the common and noblest heritage of  the human race, will not be spared. Thus, truth being gradually obscured by  darkness, pernicious and manifold error, as too often happens, will easily prevail. Thus, too, license will gain what liberty loses; for liberty will ever be more free and secure in proportion as license is kept in fuller restraint. In  regard, however, to all matter of opinion which God leaves to man's free  discussion, full liberty of thought and of speech is naturally within the right  of everyone; for such liberty never leads men to suppress the truth, but often  to discover it and make it known.

 Libertas, Leo XIII, 1888

For you well know, venerable brethren, that at this time men are found not a few who, applying to civil society the impious and absurd  principle of "naturalism," as they call it, dare to teach that "the best  constitution of public society and (also) civil progress altogether require that  human society be conducted and governed without regard being had to religion any  more than if it did not exist; or, at least, without any distinction being made  between the true religion and false ones." And, against the doctrine of  Scripture, of the Church, and of the Holy Fathers, they do not hesitate to
assert that "that is the best condition of civil society, in which no duty is  recognized, as attached to the civil power, of restraining by enacted penalties,  offenders against the Catholic religion, except so far as public peace may require." From which totally false idea of social government they do not fear to  foster that erroneous opinion, most fatal in its effects on the Catholic Church and the salvation of souls, called by Our Predecessor, Gregory XVI, an "insanity,"2 viz., that "liberty of conscience and worship is each man's  personal right, which ought to be legally proclaimed and asserted in every  rightly constituted society; and that a right resides in the citizens to an  absolute liberty, which should be restrained by no authority whether  ecclesiastical or civil, whereby they may be able openly and publicly to  manifest and declare any of their ideas whatever, either by word of mouth, by  the press, or in any other way." But, while they rashly affirm this, they do not  think and consider that they are preaching "liberty of perdition;"3 and that "if  human arguments are always allowed free room for discussion, there will never be  wanting men who will dare to resist truth, and to trust in the flowing speech of  human wisdom; whereas we know, from the very teaching of our Lord Jesus Christ,  how carefully Christian faith and wisdom should avoid this most injurious babbling."4

Quanta Cura, Pius IX 1864

It is doubtful whether England would accept governance by the heavenly host but by an organization as utterly tainted as the  Vatican - you  cannot be serious. But of course there is always ignorance and ignorance is  enthusiastically cultivated by clerical and secular  anti-educators alike


The Reformation was a number of things. One of them  was people failing to make a connection between Jesus's teachings and  what is known  of his life and a mega-buck empire based in Rome. Since  neither the New  Testament nor the mega-buck empire has vanished, people  continue to fail to  make the connection, regardless of how many saintly  priests do good works in abject poverty.

How simple is it possible to make this? Jesus did not  like religious farts. A large number of people inside the Churches and  outside them,  follow Jesus because he did not like religious farts.  Attempting to foist religious farts on people on the grounds they  represent Jesus isn't going to  wash.

And how it's done, the conversion of a democracy to a   theocracy, is of course by seizing the citadels of bourgeois power,  politicans  as puppets.

It goes on and on, the filth, the attempted indoctrination that faith is intrinsically superior, when it is entirely evident that it isn't

 And in the very dead of night, long after even the  most  determined revellers are tucked up in their little beds, long after the foxes  have finished crashing around in the bins, when it's  absolutely quiet, if you put your ear to the ground you can hear a  rustling noise like dry paper. That's  money talking.

Bunch of bloody whores, and probably well-paid ones, spreading their dirty monkey legs.  Butcher her, of course o master, destroy her, as you say, o master, of course you know best, o master.  Whores like to be pleasing.  It’s what they’re paid for.
 
Should I get on with my needlework because subnormal monkey-women think it’s just silly for a woman to pretend to be an intellectual?  I mean, it’s not as though I were a NERS, a bloody brute beast, an ignorant and ineducable mong, a dirty spite-ridden, vindictive, malevolent, psychopathic  criminal mong.  All little girls want to be nurses, dear.  Because they’re too bloody damaged to want to be physicists or posties or pilots or poets or philosophers.  Animal-women spawned by perverts, freaks, sicko monkey kinky-boys who pronounce on the sub-species woman, as though they were naturalists pronouncing on an insect.  Oh they know what we are, what we’re capable of, what we’re allowed to be, because their freak sick-boy ape brains tell them we have to be controlled.  I, a human being, like any other human being able, within individual limitations of ability and aptitudes, to be and do anything I choose to do and be.  Except go for a walk of course, because the sick-boy ape kinky-boy pervert twisted subhuman obscenities Linch, Naylor and Goldstone decided I didn’t need to be able to walk properly or to run.  Sick obscene pervert kinky-boys assume they decide for women.  Our views are not necessary, not required.  If cunt filth ape savage butcher psychopath Linch thinks I don’t need to be able to walk, well, that’s that, then, innit.  Huge joke, ‘Professor’ Linch.  He thinks kinky-bitch mongs have degrees, tard mong spass child-monster-animals who can’t learn, can’t reason, can’t speak, care nothing about fact and reason, mental age of two, sniggering and tittering. Obvious what was happening to my body.  Obvious the absence of democracy.  Obvious I was having no effect.  Oh no, nobody could do anything.
 
Wordless mindless butchery and the wordless mindless attempt at my mental and physical destruction.  That tells you everything you need to know about the non-existent intellectual capacities of these sick animals.
 
Nutjobs probably whine that the Glorious Revolution or the French Revolution couldn’t have happened because the Holy Farter wouldn’t have allowed it.  Believe it, sick boys, his opinion was not sought.
 
As if I’m capable of giving a fuck about creatures like these.